Recent content by 4tea7

well yea sure its better than the 290 but im just saying the 290x has been said and on benchmarks i have read, from reviews, tomshardware, linustechtips, etc there is very little difference, its almost no point unless you really really want top of the line its like a 6 percent difference in...

i know but 290 is pretty close performance to the 290x and 290x is alot more expensive plus the non reference cards will come out in december and they will run alot cooler and this will improve performance for the cards i know the 290x is pretty much on par with the titan and sometimes...

well if you have 200% resolution scale for 1680 res then 1680 multiplied by 2 = 3360 resolution, thats very good 4k resolution or ultra hd is 3840 x 2160 pixels or 4096 x 2160 pixels and 1080p multiplied by 4 is actually 4320, anyway just some fun facts 770 is a neat card but i found that...

has anyone tried benchmarking bf4 with resolution scale set to 200% with ultra settings and 1080p or any res for that matter i made a topic about this because i cant find any benchmarks showcasing supersampling (resolution scale)

i use the rat 7

Wow thats really good, what resolution are you running? is this all on ultra settings with 200% resolution scale?

Thanks for reply, so you mean if you put supersampling to 150% or 200% on ultra your fps dips to 30 and below? if so still that 7970 is a beast card, i believe its got higher clock speeds than the 280

I havent seen one benchmark that showcases maxed out resolution scale its seen under video settings if anyone is able to run bf4 in med and beyond then please post your specs below i really want to know to help me decide what gpu i should buy So basically to see what setup you are running and...

I used to play cs source like 4-6 years ago, Found eGO in the server list, then Cs got outplayed and i left that for cod on the playstation, that got outplayed after a couple games(4 years) sold everything a while back and switched back to pc finally.

4tea7