No, I do not. We are looking at a mere sample or section of the game. The strategic formula is really not applied when we are looking at streams of people at either E3, or the hidden streams of those engrossed in the Alpha of the game. People are trying out different things, looking at potential performance issues, the graphics, the gameplay, how the weapons work, how the vehicles drive, on a new map within a new game. Everyone is doing their own thing in the game. When this happens, any scope of strategy and tactical advancement is tossed out the window. It's been this way since the alpha/beta of every Battlefield title, from 1942, all the way up to 4.
The current slice of the product that EA/DICE has released is but a small page in a book, in which, by principal, you cannot either love or hate the book on this particular one page.
I'll agree with you on one point, that this game (or no other game, really) is worth a 60 dollar price tag, however, this is the standard MSRP for AAA titles in this day of age.