Call of Duty 4 or Call of Duty: World at War

[Destroy]

Choose between Cod4 and CodWaW, or wait for Modern Warfare 2. MW2 is basically COD4 but with CODWAW features and a new story, 7+ hours of gameplay for SP.

 

[Markus]

Choose between Cod4 and CodWaW, or wait for Modern Warfare 2. MW2 is basically COD4 but with CODWAW features and a new story, 7+ hours of gameplay for SP.

Modern Warfare 2 is getting a graphics change and isn't using the CoD4 engine.

----

On the side note; Call of Duty 4 is better then CoD:WaW for a couple reasons.

1. Call of Duty 4 has a better, more compelling storyline. And once you play one mission you're going to want to play the next mission to find out what happens next (It's like a book, you read a page and flip to the next one to find out more).

2. Call of Duty: World at War is basically Call of Duty 4, same graphics, different guns, but I would still recommend CoD:WaW to WWII video game junkies.

3. The weapons in CoD4 are more smooth. But that's just me, cause I think modern weapons these days like the M16 and Ak47 can easily outlast a Thompson and BAR.

Only thing CoD:WaW has that CoD4 doesn't is Nazi Zombies technically.

 

[king killer]

Cod 4 just cause i didnt get bored of it by he time i was 10th prestige (i was also in the #1 dbles clan in the world on it lol)

 

[Joeymadman]

Call of Duty 4.. CoD:WaW was just garbage...