which you think it is better at gameplay and tactical stuff
Company of Heroes
Company of Heroes
umm what?CoH is just one of those meh games from ubisoft
sc2 = one of those awesome games from blizzard.
Yeah, it's all about different rushes in the lower levels when people don't know what they're doing that much. Most games in upper leagues go up to 5 bases at around 30-45mins and is huge on multipronged attacks and tactical descisions.I have both and company of heroes is hands down the best RTS out there.
SC2 is enjoyable, but its really down to how fast you can click. I never find that there is much strategic depth in SC2 - its all about different rush's....feels more arcade like.
CoH won me over simply because of the possibilities of the units, and how to strategically place and manoeuvre them. Team work is alot better.
I could go on and on. Simply the only way to compare properly is if you are not a SC2 Fanboy/or CoH, otherwise its just down to stubbornness. SC2 might have been good for years...but remember, CoH was not out then.
Again... Starcraft II unit control is HUGE. You need to get flanks, have better positioning, and unit control to win battles. It's a huge part of the game, I'm really tired of all these people saying the units don't require control..Hmmm
if you go just by pure tactics, I have to say CoH.
SCII, while I have never played it, but many other RTS are similiar in that build order and mass spamming is more important than placement of units.
COH is much more tactical from a unit perspective in the gameplay effects. If you use tactics, you can easily stop a rush with a 1/10 of the amount of units using the proper tactics. SCII is more about how many X units can I build before I rush with them.
I personally find it like comparing apples to oranges. You wouldn't play CSS for the realism