Red vs. Blue

[SingularPoint]

Started with Halo 1, personally my favorite part of the whole series is when they try to explain how they went from Halo 1 to 2.

 

[GreatWhiteDeath87]

Ok. If you guys want to see all of the RVB episodes just go to the website: http://roosterteeth.com/archive/?sid=rvb.

It's where the guys got there start online. It started out as a few computer programmers who wanted something to do in between jobs and then the let their friends get involved by being the voices.

It is incredible. The cast of characters they have on the show they made are all hilarious in their own right. Definitely worth seeing again and again.

 

[Sexy Beast]

But, the website says 'released 5 years ago'

I trust it over wiki any day.

And Split, it started with Halo 1 and they did receive awards from Bungie

>.<

What is with people and Wikipedia. It's like people have a built in distrust of the site for some mundane reason.


Anyway here is a BBC article dating back to 2003 that mentions Red Vs. Blue: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3107599.stm

 

[Ph?bus]

>.<

What is with people and Wikipedia. It's like people have a built in distrust of the site for some mundane reason.


Anyway here is a BBC article dating back to 2003 that mentions Red Vs. Blue: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/3107599.stm

Because anyone can edit it.
I mean sure, if you already know the information, you can verify that it's right, but some d-bag can just go to Wikipedia and edit any post he wants.

 

[Two Listen]

Because anyone can edit it.
I mean sure, if you already know the information, you can verify that it's right, but some d-bag can just go to Wikipedia and edit any post he wants.

Wikipedia has a very effective checks and balances system that monitors page edits, corrects them when they're found, and in the event a particular article is getting "hit" with inaccurate editing regularly, it can be locked so that only certain individuals can further edit the page (though this usually only happens temporarily while things mull over).

I've only found one page in the entirety of my internet "career" that seemed intentionally edited with an "inaccuracy", and it was for some band - someone had edited in that they were the "biggest fan". And you're definately much more likely to find inaccuracies with things of this nature. But by and large, that is not the case.

If you pay enough attention to the citations and the article, wikipedia is an invaluable resource.

 

[Sexy Beast]

Wikipedia has a very effective checks and balances system that monitors page edits, corrects them when they're found, and in the event a particular article is getting "hit" with inaccurate editing regularly, it can be locked so that only certain individuals can further edit the page (though this usually only happens temporarily while things mull over).

I've only found one page in the entirety of my internet "career" that seemed intentionally edited with an "inaccuracy", and it was for some band - someone had edited in that they were the "biggest fan". And you're definately much more likely to find inaccuracies with things of this nature. But by and large, that is not the case.

If you pay enough attention to the citations and the article, wikipedia is an invaluable resource.

Bingo!

Also check the References section for corroborating information. Much like that BBC article that I posted which shows that RvB is at least 7 years old.

 

[Liliana]

well excuse me for over estimating,



there's a season 8?

Current season, Revelation. It's the eighth.

And it's definitely 7 years old, read it somewhere on their website a long time ago. Also, I think my brother mentioned it sometime more than five years ago.