Would this be allowed? (game)

CoolioCat

Rookie
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
87
I did a poor job explaining this when I was playing, and I made it sound opionated. But this is what i mean to say:


basically, the game relies on how much a T wants ST. First I choose a number lets say 5. I put it in team chat. Then for the next 30 seconds Ts cant type except to put in ST. lets say 10 people put in ST. The 5th person (my number) would get ST and the rest would die. A fair game with high rewards, much like temptation, you can jump, but you might die.
 
I did a poor job explaining this when I was playing, and I made it sound opionated. But this is what i mean to say:


basically, the game relies on how much a T wants ST. First I choose a number lets say 5. I put it in team chat. Then for the next 30 seconds Ts cant type except to put in ST. lets say 10 people put in ST. The 5th person (my number) would get ST and the rest would die. A fair game with high rewards, much like temptation, you can jump, but you might die.

I think giving the 5th person ST would be fine, but killing all of the others would definitely not be allowed.
 
It's a good game.
Killing everyone sounds completely fair.

I think Leadership should approve this game.
 
Sounds alright, just don't murder everyone and don't keep the game going for too long. We don't want to be stuck in cell block for 10 minutes now do we ._.

Just make it a quick game to give someone St then it's over.

Or you could just give me St :>
 
This sounds like a really stupid game which means it is perfect for jail server. This will surely please that crowd.
 
If you the killings of everyone BEFORE the number gets killed (assuming the number was always 3-5), then no one would complain about mass killing.

Otherwise, this game seems alright.
 
Well I don't think everyone would type in, its like temptation in that too, everyone COULD die in temptation. But if I did the first couple die, then no one would type in.
 
Back
Top