de_dust2 improvement

[ALLAH]

The eGO server 24/7 =(eGO)=|DUST2|NO BOTS|NO AWPS AUTOS|GameME|www.Edge-gamers.com has way too many para users (m249). I suggest we reduce the amount of m249 in both teams. It really would improve the gaming experience of the active users.

What do you guys think ? Cons / pros ?

 

[DJ Wolf]

Don't think you can limit the amount of a single weapon type a team has.

 

[ALLAH]

Don't think you can limit the amount of a single weapon type a team has.

Yes you can. I've been on many servers that only allow 1 awp or similar each team.

 

[hate]

You can restrict the number of people who could use any given weapon, but why??

Welcome to the "It's part of the game" argument.

 

[Phantom373]

This would be much better suited to be put in the Dropbox.

 

[ALLAH]

You can restrict the number of people who could use any given weapon, but why??

Welcome to the "It's part of the game" argument.

"Part of the game" doesn't always mean that you have maximum cash. Para is the most expensive weapon in the game so in my opinion that argument is invalid.

It's rough enough to get team flashed all the time.

 

[hate]

but how many would you limit it to?? if you limit to 2 per team, with 10 people on the server that would be ok.... but what about when there is 30+

 

[DJ Wolf]

This really should be in the drop box.
Also, You would have whiners saying: "Why cant i get this gun", and, "Gimme this gun"
Again, its part of the game to be able to get what you want and have fun the way you want.

 

[ALLAH]

but how many would you limit it to?? if you limit to 2 per team, with 10 people on the server that would be ok.... but what about when there is 30+

If I'd had the change to decide how many para's would be allowed it would be as much as there is awps, zero. But since this is very popular server and it rarely got under 25 people playing I would still limit the para count to two or one each team.

This really should be in the drop box.
Also, You would have whiners saying: "Why cant i get this gun", and, "Gimme this gun"
Again, its part of the game to be able to get what you want and have fun the way you want.

They are not whining about awps so why would they whine about m249 ?

 

[hate]

awp is a little different...

I would compare the para more to the p90... I would say that if we start by limiting the para, we would have to restrict the p90 as well...

While I understand the frustration, I would vote to say no to the restriction of the para.

 

[RedDragonKnight]

I would compare the para more to the p90...

the p90 is not a 1 hit headshot nor does it have the capacity or range the m249 has. the 2 are completely different.

Compared to the ak47, all the para has is more recoil and more ammo. Theres not much difference to getting instakilled by an ak and instakilled by a para, but you do see most people sitting there spraying you with the para and getting a random headshot, which really isn't an issue as you can easily double tap their head with any AR and kill them before they randomly kill you.

 

[ALLAH]

awp is a little different...

I would compare the para more to the p90... I would say that if we start by limiting the para, we would have to restrict the p90 as well...

While I understand the frustration, I would vote to say no to the restriction of the para.

I find that irrelevant to compare p90 to para, effectiveness of para is far more superior compared to p90 in distance. Weapon "stats" and price have been defined by Counter-Strike Source, expensive weapons are more effective. And awp costs around the para price which isn't even near the p90 price.

 

[Full Grizzly]

You can restrict the number of people who could use any given weapon, but why??

Welcome to the "It's part of the game" argument.

I don?t fully agree with that. I mean, yes it?s a part of the game but why did eGO restrict AWPS and the semi-automatic sniperrifle? That's part of the game as well and yet it's restricted.

@ ALLAH, I don't really mind the amount of para's in the game. It's fun. Yes of course, it can get frustrating sometimes when you keep getting killed by the same camper that uses the Machine Gun. But, and now I have to agree with Hate. It is part of the game.
I doubt leadership will restrict the amount of Machine Guns in the servers, unless it's becoming a real problem. But, I don't see that happening to be honest.

I must say, I love the fact that people come up with suggestions to try and improve the servers. Good to see & keep it up!

 

[hate]

I must say, I love the fact that people come up with suggestions to try and improve the servers. Good to see & keep it up!

It's what makes the community better

 

[shan^K]

I disagree with limiting any weapons, it ruins the gaming experience. Might as well limit flashes and grenades since they are also a bother. On a side note ALLAH your name GREATLY offends me.

 

[Full Grizzly]

I disagree with limiting any weapons, it ruins the gaming experience. Might as well limit flashes and grenades since they are also a bother. On a side note ALLAH your name GREATLY offends me.

To be honest, I'm surprised he was allowed to pick that name.

 

[Immortal Technique]

A couple of disclaimers before I give my 2 cents

1."this is better in the Dropbox" I disagree it's likely more useful to leadership to see the amount of people who want a change rather than just the opinion of one person

2.""your name greatly offends me" I would like to remind you the topic of this thread is machine Gubs on DUST2 a highly populated server. Despite this I feel obliged to tell you that the WORD Allah is merely the arabic word for god. Any Arab of any faith will refer to God as Allah

Now to return to topic, I believe paras cause the map to become unbalanced for counter terrorists. The cts need only to cover the 4 choke points with a para and victory for terrorists becomes an uphill battle at best. A restriction to two paras will make guessing a good rush 50 50

 

[Kerri]

A couple of disclaimers before I give my 2 cents

1."this is better in the Dropbox" I disagree it's likely more useful to leadership to see the amount of people who want a change rather than just the opinion of one person

2.""your name greatly offends me" I would like to remind you the topic of this thread is machine Gubs on DUST2 a highly populated server. Despite this I feel obliged to tell you that the WORD Allah is merely the arabic word for god. Any Arab of any faith will refer to God as Allah

Now to return to topic, I believe paras cause the map to become unbalanced for counter terrorists. The cts need only to cover the 4 choke points with a para and victory for terrorists becomes an uphill battle at best. A restriction to two paras will make guessing a good rush 50 50

I was playing the other day with dem0n, even though he and another CT had a para spraying B tunnels they still broke though and killed us.

I don't think any more weapons should be restricted, the server is greatly popular as it is and I know a lot of people enjoy the para. Restricting it would cause more problems IMO.

 

[Full Grizzly]

I was playing the other day with dem0n, even though he and another CT had a para spraying B tunnels they still broke though and killed us.

I don't think any more weapons should be restricted, the server is greatly popular as it is and I know a lot of people enjoy the para. Restricting it would cause more problems IMO.

Agreed. Nobody touch the Para's. I'll go mental if it gets restricted :')

 

[Alucard7]

I think this seriously should be a topic for the drop box,and not something to cause problems in the forums since clearly you aren't going to find many people who will agree with a ludicrous idea of restricting a gun that is part of the game. Using the amount of money you start out with to say that argument isn't valid is about as much a logical fallacy as the next person to try to argue against eGO policy against swearing because of the rating of a game even if those ratings don't apply to online play.