We supported a rush server for the greater part of a year, but due to lack of interest we had to pull it. That being said, if numbers go up, and recruiting through the roof, it is not out of the question.
Let's focus on getting the current servers on the top of the ranks, then we can get more. I mean look at the CS division, it's huge and it couldn't manage all CSGO servers. They had to remove them all expect one, which is starting to go up the ranks.
Play, have fun, recruit. Rinse and repeat. ThundrRok
I have four members this month. Once this cold clears up I will do my best to get more members coming in as I too would like to see a new server implemented. I think a Rush/CQ-D/AK server on hardcore would be amazing (maybe throw in Strike at Karkand and Oman too)
I can find HC close quarters servers (populated). What I have a hard time finding is a HC rush server. Even looking at empty servers, there's only 17 servers total right now (not counting the ones with strangely low player limits like 8 or 16).
Right now there are two populated HC rush servers in US/Canada. One is just mixed modes that happens to be on rush at the moment, the other has four people in it.
![]()
I know our HC aftermath server is often fully populated, it would be nice to see another HC server populated too.
I can find HC close quarters servers (populated). What I have a hard time finding is a HC rush server. Even looking at empty servers, there's only 17 servers total right now (not counting the ones with strangely low player limits like 8 or 16).
Right now there are two populated HC rush servers in US/Canada. One is just mixed modes that happens to be on rush at the moment, the other has four people in it.
![]()
I know our HC aftermath server is often fully populated, it would be nice to see another HC server populated too.
Hey Def,
Yea it would be nice to have HC rush, but as has been mentioned, when we did have rush they weren't very popular for one reason or another. Also, as Thundr said, if we focus on fun and recruiting it could be a possibility again in the future.
Yea, I realize HC rush isn't anywhere near as popular as 24/7 Metro CQ or TDM Canals. There are a handful of servers I often play on for HC rush. In fact, HC rush was the reason I joined eGO. I played almost exclusively HC rush in BC2, and remember seeing myself on the eGO server often, and still played on eGO's HC server on BF3.You also have described the main reason we lost the Rush server. There really isn't a market/sustainable number of players during all hours. Don't think I'm saying no, I'm just saying let's get in there, recruit, and have fun. At the end of the day, if things have turned for the best, we may have opened a door.
I am glad you have voiced a server configuration, it is always great to hear what our members want to play, to better orientate them. As previously said, there aren't plans for HC rush in the immediate future.
Yea, I realize HC rush isn't anywhere near as popular as 24/7 Metro CQ or TDM Canals. There are a handful of servers I often play on for HC rush. In fact, HC rush was the reason I joined eGO. I played almost exclusively HC rush in BC2, and remember seeing myself on the eGO server often, and still played on eGO's HC server on BF3.
I'm not suggesting we jump right in to getting a server for this, but something that we should remember in the future. Rush died down a lot because Close Quarters didn't bring any new rush maps, and Armored Kill had terrible balance issues. They did a great job with Aftermath, and there was a big spike in rush after it's release. Assuming Endgame has new maps with rush modes, perhaps add in a HC rush server after it's release. Then, a few weeks after it's release when it's slowed down, add in vanilla and Aftermath maps to the rotation. Or even a mixed HC rush/conquest with more of a city focus (Aftermath, Endgame, Metro, Seine, Bazaar, Tehran, and maybe some Sharqi and Karkand).