Saw "movie"

[3PEAT]

They really shouldve stopped at 3...Now they are just milking it for all its worth..

 

[No Remorse]

Alot of people are saying they didnt like the last few ones. But the thing is, you still went and seen it. Same will probably happen with this one. I could really careless about the storyline, I am kinda intrigued by the new devices they keep coming up with. Its pretty creative.

 

[Cut Chem!st]

Hm.. I kinda stopped watching them when they just became insanely gorey for no reason.

Atleast in the first one it was stoooooorrryyygooreeestorrry

now its

GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORE, oh yeah forgot we need a reason to put this in the theaters, here's some story

 

[GumBa11Machine]

Well...ehh...there are a lot better films that you could be pulling apart than the Saw films. They usually are haphazardly shot and poorly plotted. Also the first Saw film had a $1.2 Million budget and not a $500k.

If you want a really good example of a film shot on the Ultra-cheap and still looks great; try Primer. It had a budget of $7,000, unfortunately it has a plot that is convoluted enough to confuse just about anyone who sees it

Another one is Brick which is a damn fine film with a budget coming in at $450K.

Yeah sorry i had just woken up and didn't put the right number. Being half asleep and typing don't mix well =P Its fixed

And i pick apart every movie i see, unless i'm not interested. The next film i plan on seeing is "Where the wild things are". It comes out on my birthday =]

 

[zippy258]

I haven't really watched them, but I from what I have been told the amount of money made out of the franchise was like a roller coasters; it started out great, but at about 3 they started making less money.