LOL Who would win in Chess? (Read the thread)

Ok here is my opinion. I think many people are automatically picking Napolean just cause of who Hitler was. As for what they have done to humanity, they were both pretty equal:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...apoleon-barbaric-Hitler-historian-claims.html

I would have to pick Hitler on this one. Just look at how massive of a force it took to bring the third reich down. Hitler was always thinking of new and better ways to improve weapons, technology, you name it. Napolean was pretty content in what he had at the time.

Nazis made many contributions in aviation, medicine, weaponry and many other fields. Depsite what people are willing to accept, Hitler was a very intelligent man.

As I said, he was a smart man but he would make too many mistakes, he was not a military strategist, Napoleon was. This is what leads me to think Napoleon would win.
 
Ok here is my opinion. I think many people are automatically picking Napolean just cause of who Hitler was. As for what they have done to humanity, they were both pretty equal:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...apoleon-barbaric-Hitler-historian-claims.html

I would have to pick Hitler on this one. Just look at how massive of a force it took to bring the third reich down. Hitler was always thinking of new and better ways to improve weapons, technology, you name it. Napolean was pretty content in what he had at the time.

Nazis made many contributions in aviation, medicine, weaponry and many other fields. Depsite what people are willing to accept, Hitler was a very intelligent man.

He was very intelligent, but he wasn't the one thinking this stuff up. His skill was being a passionate leader that was great at motivating and delegating to the other people that could make those contributions and advancements. So unless he gave a speech that motivated some strategist better than Napoleon to play the game in his place a victory for him wouldn't happen.

Regardless, I stand by my original answer.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top