Assassins Creed II

BlackBird.

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Jun 1, 2009
Messages
2,865
Hello,

You guys probably all know the game Assassins Creed II. It hasnt come out for the PC jet, so this is a question for Xbox360 and PS3 users.
Is this a beter game then the first Assassins Creed? Becaus they said here in netherland i would come out a half year ago but it hasnt come out jet:P. It wil in 1 week. So exually i dont care much about the game anymore after a half year, becaus the first weeks after it exually should came out. You pretty excited about the game, after a month it becomes less, ander after a half year you exually dont want the game anymore:P

What you guys think about this game?

BlackBird.:P ;)

(and btw, if i make any English Grammer mistakes PM me or post it here, i'll try to make my english beter)
 
Last edited:
100x Better
I love the new weapons, the combat system and pretty much everything about it. The new features such as two blades etc is just really fun. :D
The storyline is also great.

I also love stealing the guards weapons and owning them with it.

(I have it for the 360)

I recommend anyone getting it, i found Assassins creed 1 boring, number 2 takes the game to a higher standard, i never got bored of it. xD
 
yea the storyline is also an important thing. In Assassins Creed 1, it was really hard to follow where the story was about. How is this in Assassin Creed 2? Beter to follow where the story is about?
 
Pretty much, it helps you "ALOT" in the game to find your objectives theres blips on a minimap, you can either follow the storyline or go off doing other things such as small missions(i think they are missions) for beating up people etc. xD
 
I rented it, given the chance on a low price I'd buy it in a heart beat.
 
I skipped buying AC1 due to all the complaints of it being repetitive, but when I heard AC2 fixed most of the problems in the first, I decided to buy it. It's really fun. So many missions and side quests to do, its fun owning your own villa and being able to invest in it, good variety of armor/weapons, and the voice acting is top notch.

It's a great game, you should definitely buy it
 
Ok thanks everyone:) I'll wait till the 4th then; then AC2 will be in the shops.
And one last questions....What about the graphics, are those also beter?
 
I agree with everyone here. The game is such a good game. Side quests to do owning your own house, the graphics are much more crisp and the environment itself is just beautiful. Much more backstory then the old one. Such as the fact you don't just start out as a master assassin. You start out as a teen and end the game when your like 40 something. As for gameplay there are very few glitches ive come across and none of them big. Overall it is a much better game then assassin's creed 1 and not to mention with stuff people make mods for on pc I think ti would be much more fun to own on PC anyway. :)
P.S. One problem I see people complaining about with the game is that it is very sacreligious. But then again so is the whole series... But if this isn't an issue with you then this game is a definite buy. (If you have played the first one you will fit in nicely.)

~R3D
 
Im renting it out right now its really fun taking a while to beat though. Just wanna beat the missions then see if renting again could be the case to get the rest of everything else.
 
I loved the first game, and I loved ACII even more, in fact Assassin's Creed II was my GOTY (And if anyone mentions Uncharted 2, yes that game was awesome but I still liked ACII better.) of last year. In my opinion, even if you didn't like AC1, its worth playing. It improves on #1 ten fold, while retaining the elements that made #1 good. The controls are smooth, the graphics are breath taking (Watching the sun rise on the crystal clear waters of Venezia... WOW. Kinda makes me want to go back there again. Curse my empty wallet.) and the story is good, even if it gets confusing at the end, hell, even the character says "WTF."

Assassin's Creed II improves mostly in variety. The biggest negative of part 1 was its repetition, essentially doing things repeatedly with little variation. And while the story was great, and I have praised GTA IV's story despite it pulling this tactic (And me still not approving of it) but I don't like it when a story stops and before you can push it forward significantly you have to pick up tidbits in a random order. I also felt Altair was a weak character and didn't really have much of a past. ACII fixes both of these, there's a larger variety of side quests and they all have a different "Set piece" each time (I.E. rather than just repeating them with a different character model, they actually have objectives and different locales etc.) and they even have assassination missions, which helps the immersion factor since it was somewhat annoying in the first game you would take forever to actually.. well, I dunno, ASSASSINATE someone. They also have a linear plot path this time, and having a linear plot path keeps it fresh and easier to follow. That and Ezio is a much more interesting character as they have a plot behind his past (Although it was excessive to start right at his birth) and they build up to his reason to becoming an assassin, and while its fairly cliched, it works and it does provide a more logical entry point.

That's another thing about ACII's plot I liked better. In AC1, Altair was already an Assassin and you weren't learning how to become an Assassin so much as you were learning how to clean up a mess as an Assassin. ACII actually has you becoming an Assassin and going through their ways etc. etc. etc. and it felt more rewarding in that regard. I will say the ending of the game is confusing, again, and I can also say I wish they had more sequences with the flying machine than just the training sesh and the one mission. Regardless, having Da Vinci was awesome and a history Nerdgasm, and there are other historical figures that pop up.

My biggest negative for the game is that getting money is relatively easy, after a certain point your villa will bring in enough dough that you could probably put a price on the Ark of the Covenant. This makes armour, bribes, and weapons ridiculously easy to collect, and the more you collect the more money you actually get. They pay you to buy stuff. I'll also say that "The Truth" didn't hold much Truth for me. I kinda guessed who the two figures were instantly (Though I still won't spoil it) but honestly I didn't get what "The Truth" was and I think if you are going to have a set of tough puzzles searching for answers, they should actually give you more answers rather than another question.

I have the PS3 version, and honestly I feel its the weaker version. Mainly because the PS3's graphics have proved to be weaker with multi-platform games, and not only is there annoying pop-in there's also an unsteady framerate, I've seen the game drop to 18 on the PS3 version whereas my brother claims the 360 version he has never stutters. Also the PS3 version is glitchy, and has been known to crash and give you "The white screen of death" which prevents you from progressing. I had this for about a week and a half and it ticked me off.

This is a nitpick, but as a history dork there was one bit that REALLY ticked me off. After you beat the game, you can go back to a family tomb and there are chronicles of one of your ancestors becoming an Assassin. The problem? He was trained by Dante Alighieri. Does anyone see the error in that? If the Assassins are fighting the Templars...... How the hell could Dante Alighieri be a GOTDAMN ASSASSIN? Did they actually do their research on him? Ahem, the whole thing about him being a Templar? Whatever.

All in all: Its an awesome game.
 
haha:) What have you done to my morning? It took my like 3 hours to read this:)
No just kidding, thanks for your..... story:)
 
May be an awesome game, but there are some things to consider if you are planning on purchasing the PC version:

The price - $60 at release for the PC vs. the standard $50. Personally, I don't tend to purchase games at full price, anyway, (there are so many other great games to play, that I can wait for the price to drop), but paying $60 is not something I would even consider. It makes more sense on the console side of things (where the consoles have a royalty fee), but it's not something I would want to support as the norm for PC gaming.

DRM - http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=235290
*Requires constant internest connection in order to play.
*Will drop the player to the main menu if the internet connection is ever lost.
*All progress is lost when this happens, and the player is forced to restart from a previous checkpoint.

All-and-all, it's not a game I would purchase on the PC if you have other options.
 
Yea indeed im also considering to wait 2 months, and then buy it for 30 or something.
 
The DRM is keeping me from buying this game. I'll wait until they remove it to play it. It's not that I don't have a constant connection it's just the principle of it. Not everyone has a constant connection so those people will be unable to play this game.

It won't stop piracy because nothing yet has stopped people from finding ways around the DRM. All they are doing is putting a restriction on the people who go out and legally buy the game.
 
Back
Top