QFT
Katanas are still pretty cool in my book though.
Pretty much my opinion. Japanese aren't receiving FedEx weapon deliveries from God every day, but they make interesting stuff.
QFT
Katanas are still pretty cool in my book though.
/Froths at mouth at the glorification of stupid katanas...
Besides that isn't even that impressive, the mythbusters did this on an axehead with a musket
Im sure a claymore, gladius, short sword, cinqueda etc. could do the exact same thing. Its not because of the sharpness its the speed of the bullet. Bullets at such a high velocity break up when they hit water, let alone metal.
And yeah Frank Booth, it can cut through five human bodies, if you tie them down and remove all their clothes... It is a sword made for killing unarmored untrained peasants. It wasn't even used much. Go figure.
So that whole Sengoku Jidai period, not a lot of samurai's died? hummm.....
Yeah, there were times samurai fought each other en masse, but most of the time they were just fighting Ashigaru.
Anywho I do agree the katana is a cool sword, and it is also pretty amazingly made, doesn't make it the end all of swords however and people should stop portraying it as so.

all depends on your .. opinion.. since we're all entitled to our own![]()
Uhhh someone didnt watch the video..
That doesn't really prove it, that could easily be faked...Not saying it is, but it's definitely possible.
you could say anything on mythbusters could be faked....
Ok. In case anyone wants to hear a little bit of facts beyond "katanas rulezorz" or "katanas suck butt" let me tell you people some things.
1. I have split a bullet with a ten dollar wal-mart pocket knife. Personally. Splitting a bullet doesn't have anything to do with the quality of the blade. It has to do with the way bullets react to wedge-shaped objects.
2. Katanas are cool. Yes. And they are very good at the kind of combat they were designed for. They are draw-cut weapons, however, which are by definition most effective against un- or soft-armored targets. That isn't saying they weren't used against other samurai, samurai mostly used soft armor. For what katanas were used for, they would be just as effective as any other draw-cut weapon. Would a katana be effective against chain or plate mail? No. But they weren't up against that, so it doesn't matter.
3. An argument on the internet is ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS. ESPECIALLY ONE ABOUT SWORDS.
3. An argument on the internet is ABSOLUTELY POINTLESS. ESPECIALLY ONE ABOUT SWORDS.
It may be pointless but it is also fun. :bored:
/Froths at mouth at the glorification of stupid katanas...
Besides that isn't even that impressive, the mythbusters did this on an axehead with a musket
Im sure a claymore, gladius, short sword, cinqueda etc. could do the exact same thing. Its not because of the sharpness its the speed of the bullet. Bullets at such a high velocity break up when they hit water, let alone metal.
And yeah Frank Booth, it can cut through five human bodies, if you tie them down and remove all their clothes... It is a sword made for killing unarmored untrained peasants. It wasn't even used much. Go figure.