Article ITT I attempt to review every movie I've seen.



Darkman_film_poster.jpg


Title: Darkman
Year: 1990
Country of Origin: US
Director: Sam Raimi

Story: "I'm everyone - and no one. Everywhere - nowhere. Call me... Darkman."

Review: I think that Terrence Rafferty from the New Yorker sum this up better than I could, "Raimi works from inside the cheerfully violent adolescent-male sensibility of superhero comics, as if there were no higher style for a filmmaker to aspire to, and the absence of condescension is refreshing."

[8/10]
 
Quarantineposter.jpg


Title: Quarantine
Year: 2008
Country of Origin: US
Director: John Erick Dowdle

Story: 28 Days Later meets The Blair Witch Project...yet again.

Review: This is the US remake of REC and as remakes go, this one isn't half that bad. It's pretty close in quality to the original, but subtle changes in the films characters, pacing and story knocks the film down a couple of pegs. As such I do recommend the original over the remake.

[6.5/10]

US fails yet again at remaking Foreign horror films

Quarantine = Rec

Rec > Quarantine
 
Hey Sexy Beast, not sure if you have Taking of Pelham 123 in your Netflix queue, but I just rented the blu-ray version. Ill watch it & give my review for ya. Im sure theres some people that have been wanting to get a review for this movie.
 
Hey Sexy Beast, not sure if you have Taking of Pelham 123 in your Netflix queue, but I just rented the blu-ray version. Ill watch it & give my review for ya. Im sure theres some people that have been wanting to get a review for this movie.

The original or the bad remake?
 
Taking_of_Pelham_123_%282009_film%29.jpg


Title: The Taking of Pelham 123
Year: 2009
Country of Origin: US
Director: Tony Scott

Story: John Travolta takes over a subway train.

Review: I think I've said this before, but I feel the need to reiterate this: Tony Scott is a hack. Yep, a hack...that man simply suck at directing films. He has three entertaining movies floating in a sea of crap. Taking of Pelham 123 is one of those movies populating that sea of crap. It's simply a poorly done film with a ton of filler and a piss poor story. There isn't a likable character in the whole film...not one. The protagonist is uninteresting and the antagonist just comes off as an ass. I haven't seen the original, but I'm going to venture a guess that it is infinitely better than this turd.

[3/10]
 
Last edited:
Surprised no one has mentioned this yet.


Sexy_beast_ver1.jpg


Title: Sexy Beast
Year: 2000
Country of Origin: US
Director: Jonathan Glazer

Story: Retired criminal is invited to do one last job.

Review: This is one weird movie and on top of that, the beginning of film moves incredibly slow. The film does pick up though and leads to a satisfying conclusion. It's a well acted film and it's well directed, but not a spectacular movie.

[8/10]
 
Reservoir Dogs


Reservoir_dogs_ver1.jpg


Title: Reservoir Dogs
Year: 1992
Country of Origin: US
Director: Quentin Tarantino

Story: "I don't tip because society says I have to. All right, if someone deserves a tip, if they really put forth an effort, I'll give them something a little something extra. But this tipping automatically, it's for the birds. As far as I'm concerned, they're just doing their job."

Review: Tarantino's debut film is...well...brilliant. The story, acting, directing, pacing, dialog...everything...incredibly well done. This is independent film making at its best. Trust me, despite the foul language of this film, you want to see this movie.

[9/10]
 
Back
Top