Article ITT I attempt to review every movie I've seen.

Hey, your doing something you enjoy, and others are helping you with it. So I can see how, and it's nice to get reviews about a film before I go to see it.

heh, all true.

So I did something incredibly dumb and elected to do a Masters Thesis, so I have no idea what that means for this thread. Probably nothing.

Anyway, welcome to October. I'll try to do a horror film a day for the rest of the month. So let's do this!
 
Halloween_cover.jpg


Title: Halloween
Year: 1978
Country of Origin: US
Director: John Carpenter

Plot: Oh, hey I finally saw Halloween!

Review: John Carpenter's Halloween is a wonderful film. I don?t think I have seen a horror film with as much restraint as this film has?actually most films do not have the restraint on display here. To better explain this, let?s do a brief overview of the plot first.

Fifteen years after a young Michael Myers brutally murders, he escapes a mental institution and returns to his hometown. Only when he gets there, he does not launch into a murder spree. Instead, he begins to stalk a small group of young women.

See this is where this film succeeds and while others fail. The first two thirds of the film are almost exclusively dedicated to building tension and atmosphere. As Michael Myers stalks Jamie Lee Curtis and company, he is relegated to the background. He is occasionally noticed, but always there?even when he is not on camera his presence is felt. I found myself scanning every shot to see if I could catch a glimpse of him. I now understand why so many people cited Halloween when reviewing It Follows, because Michael Myers is the forbearer of It Follows? supernatural monster. Even when the bodies do begin to drop, restraint is still the name of the game. The gore is kept to a minimum, instead lighting and shot composition is utilized to maximum effect?allowing your imagination to fill in the gaps.

If you haven?t seen Halloween, do not put it off like I did. This is a fantastic film that transcends its genre to become a classic of American cinema. If you want to see a horror film do right, look no further than Halloween.

[10/10]
 
So I sat down and watched the video essay Los Angeles Plays Itself. It is a fascinating look at how the film industry treats its hometown. It is also very long and pretty dull for long stretches of time. Also, I get the feeling that Thom Andersen likes to read way more into things than is necessary. At one point he claims that the destruction of Paris in Armageddon was Hollywood's way of punishing Paris and it's general refusal to fall in line with the Hollywood machine...which is an insane thing to say about a Micheal Bay film.

Actually for me, the most interesting thing about Los Angeles Plays Itself is what it inspired.

Like Colin Marshall's 'Los Angeles, the City in Cinema' series which explores films set in Los Angeles

[ame]https://vimeo.com/115483977[/ame]


Or even Every Frame a Painting, who recently did a essay cheekily entitled Vancouver Never Plays Itself.

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojm74VGsZBU[/ame]


I guess what I am trying to say is that a three hour long documentary is way too long. Also, I probably wont be reviewing Los Angeles Plays Itself, since successfully critiquing an essay seems way more academic than I am either used to or capable of doing. It's one of the pitfalls of not being a film student; I honestly don't know how to construct a critical essay on filmmaking.
 
Last edited:
Oops, missed a day.


Hellraiser-UK-Quad-poster.JPG


Title: Hellraiser
Year: 1987
Country of Origin: UK
Director: Clive Barker

Plot: So there is this puzzle box that when solved opens a portal to hell and summons demon like creatures who are really into BDSM.

Review: Hellraiser is puzzling film. With all of it's violence and grotesque imagery, why isn't it more entertaining? I think it has a lot to do with character and tone. The characters who populate the world of Hellraiser are either repugnant or dull, there really isn't an in between. Which combined with it's overtly serious tone makes the film a bit of a slog to get through. Moments of levity are injected every now and again, but they feel forced as if someone saw a rough cut of the film and felt a goofy catchphrase would be enough to fix things.

The most fascinating parts of the film comes from it's special effects and of its imaginative depiction of hell and those who reside there. The latter we only catch glimpses of particularly near the films conclusion. The film's gory special effects though are front and center almost from the beginning onward. One particularly memorable scene has mysterious from pull itself from an almost primordial ooze and slowly forms itself into a human like shape. It's scenes like this that helped to guarantee that this would turn into a franchise of considerable longevity. The most recent out this was in 2011 with the franchises ninth iteration, which was produced simply so Dimension Films could retain the rights to the series. It's odd though since box office revenue for the series as a whole only clocks in at roughly $56 million.

So to put this simply, unless you are a fan of horror films...skip Hellraiser.

[6/10]
 
Honestly, I'm a huge fan of Hellraiser, but can see where your points are coming from. Also, saw The Martian today and loved it. Was hoping you may be able to post a review for that soon.
 
Honestly, I'm a huge fan of Hellraiser, but can see where your points are coming from. Also, saw The Martian today and loved it. Was hoping you may be able to post a review for that soon.

I can totally get why people like Hellraiser, I think my disinterest in it might stem from the fact that I am in the midst of watching crap ton of horror films. So maybe the whole idiomatic idea of "familiarity breeds contempt" might be settling into the way I am viewing these movies. Still I kind of want to hit the review a horror film a day thing for October...which means I am two behind, not counting today's.

I promised a friend I'd see The Martian with him. So I'll probably see it on Thursday. I also really want to see Sicario, Villeneuve has had a pretty decent streak with his last couple of films. Which really gives me hope for that inevitable Blade Runner thing that he got tied up with.
 
Last edited:
Streettrash.jpg


Title: Street Trash
Year: 1987
Country of Origin: US
Director: James Muro

Plot: A liqueur store owners discovers a box of spoiled wine while rummaging down in his basement. He decides to sell it for a dollar a bottle to the local homeless population. One problem though, anyone who drinks the wine immediately begins to melt in a horrible way. Also, there is something about the vicious leader of a local homeless gang...and the mob is somehow involved in some aspect...or something...I can't...

Review: So let's talk about James Muro for a second. This is his first and only directorial effort, but Street Trash was not his swan song. Muro went on to have a career as a cinematographer and well regarded steady cam operator. His camera work is definitely noticeable here, Street Trash is filled with Raimi-esque kinetic steady cam shots. This film has some really impressive camera work.

Muro has also gone on record stating that he was trying to make the most offensive movie that he could...and he kind of goes for broke. So there are scenes with severed genitalia, implied necrophilia, rape, and Vietnam flashbacks. Though a lot of it is played up for yucks, which doesn't usually work. This film is billed as a horror comedy, but the comedy bits are pretty rough and the jokes tend to be at the expense of the homeless. The plot is incredibly unfocused and tends to lose plot strands only to pick them up later in a disjointed fashion. This is a cult movie through and through. Street Trash has earned its following with its gooey melting scenes and its unwillingness to abide to any sort of basic decency. The film isn't particularly good, but I can see why some people like this one. If I were, let's say 17, I probably would have loved this movie too. As of now though, I am too damn old and demand something a little more than botched attempts at comedy to go along with my excessive violence.

[5/10]
 
Last edited:
L'aldil%C3%A0-poster.jpg


Title: The Beyond
Year: 1981
Country of Origin: Italy
Director: Lucio Fulci

Plot: Ehh...from what I can gather, there is a gateway to hell that has opened up in a Louisiana hotel. A young woman from New York has somehow inherited this hotel and bad things happen.

Review: Italian horror movies are weird. There I said. I honestly don't know how else to describe them. They're visually striking and contain odd and somewhat disturbing imagery; but the plots are absolute gobbledygook. Yeah, that right gobbledygook. In fact, Lucio Fulci has stated that his intention with this movie was to make a plot free horror film...which is admirable, but does not make for an entertaining film. It makes for more of perplexing experience. One where the viewer is so busy just keeping up with what's happening in the plot that the scares take a back seat. In the end we're left with a surreal and gory film, but one that fails to connect at anything beyond its gore and surreal imagery. In the end I was simply left confounded and dissatisfied.

[4/10]
 
Last edited:
It seems we are on a downward trend with the quality. Have any special plans for what your doing on Halloween?
 
It seems we are on a downward trend with the quality. Have any special plans for what your doing on Halloween?

lol, yeah kind of. A lot of these I just picked out of Time Out's top 100 horror films. Basically whatever piqued my interest, I am reviewing.

I don't know yet. I usually wind up doing nothing. Though last year I wound up at an independent theater watching the original Dawn of the Dead with a bunch of friends...so who knows.

Also, on a side note. I still need horror movies to review. I have a couple backlogged and a few I want to watch, but the field is wide open. So recommend me horror films while I am in the market to watch em.
 
If you want to go down the campy/god-awful "horror" movies, I've got one for ya.


MANOS: THE HANDS OF FATE

(It makes troll 2 look good.)
 
If you want to go down the campy/god-awful "horror" movies, I've got one for ya.


MANOS: THE HANDS OF FATE

(It makes troll 2 look good.)

You're the second person in as many weeks to tell me to watch Manos...sans MST3K

I guess I'm dumb enough to listen to listen to you guys. So tonight I'm going to watch what is arguably the worst films of all time
 
Also, on a side note. I still need horror movies to review. I have a couple backlogged and a few I want to watch, but the field is wide open. So recommend me horror films while I am in the market to watch em.

I recommended The Babadook last year. Don't know if you have seen it yet but it's really really good.
 
I recommended The Babadook last year. Don't know if you have seen it yet but it's really really good.

I've seen like half of The Babadook. I honestly forget why I didn't finish it, but I really need to get around to seeing it all the way through.
 
Manosposter.jpg


Title: Manos: The Hands of Fate
Year: 1966
Country of Origin: US
Director: Harold P. Warren

Plot: A family gets lost during a road trip and stumbles upon a satanic-esque polygamist cult.

Review: The odd thing about this film is that I enjoy its history of it more than the actual film. Well I guess that really isn't all that odd considering the film is like watching a botched paint job dry. In case you missed it from a few pages ago, Playboy did a really interesting write up on the film's history...which despite the fact that it's playboy you check out if you're at all interested in the film.

Manos itself has become a cult favorite over the years and is in the Parthenon of other auteurs driven bombs like Ed Wood's Plan 9 From Outer Space and Tommy Wiseau's The Room. I suspect that these film hold such reverence among their fans is because they were done in an honest and forthright fashion. Most were made outside of the studio system and represent the dreams and hopes of their creators. Manos' fame is owed entirely to an episode of Mystery Science Theater 3000, which most of the cast even agree that it was the worst film that they had riffed. I can say honestly that I was never able to get through the episode, the film was simply too dull the keep my attention even with the riffs of the MST3K cast. So the prospect of watching it sans the MST3K commentary was daunting to say the least.

The first thing to notice is that the film looks awful, this is an interesting grips since a HD restoration of the film is set to be released within the next week...though by all accounts it really doesn't help the look of the film all that much. See the Manos was shot with a type of camera whose previous use was almost exclusively to shoot Korean war footage. The camera didn't record sound and each take could only last a maximum 32 seconds. Both of these would have been difficult to fix in post for even with a competent filmmaker and Warren was anything but a competent filmmaker. The result gives the film a quality that is reminiscent to early silent cinema and would have probably been better off if it were done up like a silent film. The dubbing is less than ideal; in fact during the film's premier the young actress who played the vacationing couples daughter burst into tears upon hearing a grown woman's voice speak her characters lines instead of hers.

Watching Manos is an interesting experience, but not a fun one. The film's pacing is the worst I have come across, making it's scant hour long run time feel closer to that of Lawrence of Arabia. It's a long slog to get through, but in the end you can say that you have actually sat through all of Manos: The Hands of Fate...which in of itself feels like an accomplishment akin to scaling Mt. Everest. As such, I have to award the film 10 Torgos out of 10.

[10 Torgos out of 10]
 
Last edited:
Black_christmas_movie_poster.jpg


Title: Black Christmas
Year: 1974
Country of Origin: Canada
Director: Bob Clark

Plot: Some crazy dude is making obscene phone calls to a group of sorority sisters.

Review: I am actually a little taken aback at how potent Black Christmas still is today. Within the last month I must have sat through maybe a dozen or two horror films both classic and modern and Black Christmas is so far the only one to have had an effect on me. It manages to both ratchet up tension, but also establishes a disquieting atmosphere. I think what really got to me though was the obscene phone calls...which grow to something beyond simply obscene as the film continues. Something so simple, but the way that they are presented and their actual content struck a cord with me.

It actually kind of interesting just how much Halloween and the slasher genre in general was inspired by this film...from it's holiday setting to even utilizing PoV shots of the killers perspective. Actually my favorite 'fun fact' about this film is that the director Bob Clark would go on to make another Christmas themed movie, the holiday classic A Christmas Story. Anyway, Black Christmas is a surprisingly effect horror film and if you're down for effect horror cinema...well then there you go.

[8/10]
 
Sorry for the hopfully brief break in the horror-film-a-thon like thing we're doing here...but a mixture of hangovesr and the foggy haze that you brain gets after going to a concert has taken the drive to reviews movies out of me. So tomorrow or Monday expect them to be back with a vengeance.
 
I know this wouldn't fit with the whole horror theme of October, but just finished watching American Beauty and would love to see your opinion on that. Beautiful (no pun intended) movie if you ask me.
 
Back
Top