Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Division??

Should Ghost Recon: Future Soldier Be a Future Division?

  • Yes

    Points: 5 19.2%
  • Heck Yea

    Points: 4 15.4%
  • No

    Points: 7 26.9%
  • Heck No

    Points: 10 38.5%

  • Total voters
    26
No use voting on any of them until the game is released and we see how it is received and plays.

^This. As much as I enjoy Tom Clancy games, I have a feeling that Ubisoft will pull something stupid and not make dedicated server support possible. I will probably just get it for the singleplayer.
 
So...what?
A third person, cover based game play mechanics that were built to fit best the consoles ported to PC? And we should make a division out of that?
If this "ground breaking epic of a singleplayer" does multiplayer like GRAW2 (taking away the covering option) then it's just your stock, crappy TPS with imbalanced(?) cloacking etc.
If they don't then it's just your stock, crappy TPS with cover system.
Singleplayer, which focuses on giving orders to your AI friends and taking cover behind chest high walls through out the game -> Multiplayer that doesn't let you order people and doesn't let you take cover? Like...really?
Even the demo makes it look unappealing to me. Just the same gameplay with upgraded graphics. Basically the same they've been doing throughout the franchise

And never, ever buy anything by the looks of trailers or hype by the public. Look at Hellgate: London. Trailers and cutscenes: mind baffeling, game itself: Crap on a crusted roll. This game is nothing more but an attempt by RedStorm to keep the fan blades oiled. Apparently they've succeeded.

Oh and the answer is: No. We should not make a division for this. And I have faith, so I'm just going to say: we won't make a division

Um what.
I have GRAW 2. I love that game.
It is definitely NOT a console port.
It's still an FPS, and a damn good one, like the original. I have no idea why they made them TPS on consoles. :confused1:

If it's going to be like GRAW 2, but better, with dedicated servers, I'll probably pick it up, unless Ubisoft DRM's the *%$# out of it. Which would just be stupid.
 
pick it up, unless Ubisoft DRM's the *%$# out of it. Which would just be stupid.

To answer your question about Ubisoft DRM's. The answer is Yes they will implement it like your fellow Assassin's Creed 2 and SP: Conviction...
 
Um what.
I have GRAW 2. I love that game.
It is definitely NOT a console port.
It's still an FPS, and a damn good one, like the original. I have no idea why they made them TPS on consoles. :confused1:

If it's going to be like GRAW 2, but better, with dedicated servers, I'll probably pick it up, unless Ubisoft DRM's the *%$# out of it. Which would just be stupid.
Word i Agree. G.R.A.W 2 Was amazing. I Still play on it xbox360 live. I also have it for pc but barely no 1 one online...
 

Common sense.
If that doesn't do it for you, then this;
"Splinter Cell popped up on a list of games using the DRM given to PC Gamer (via Shack) and other titles included: Silent Hunter 5: Battle of the Atlantic, Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands, and the Ghost Recon currently in development."
- http://www.vg247.com/2010/02/26/splinter-cell-conviction-on-pc-will-used-ubisofts-new-drm/

No. We shouldn't have a division for this game, I hated all the others and I'm pretty sure that because of the DRM it won't exactly be popular on the PC.
 
Common sense.
If that doesn't do it for you, then this;
"Splinter Cell popped up on a list of games using the DRM given to PC Gamer (via Shack) and other titles included: Silent Hunter 5: Battle of the Atlantic, Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands, and the Ghost Recon currently in development."
- http://www.vg247.com/2010/02/26/splinter-cell-conviction-on-pc-will-used-ubisofts-new-drm/

No. We shouldn't have a division for this game, I hated all the others and I'm pretty sure that because of the DRM it won't exactly be popular on the PC.

So now I lack common sense because I am asking for a source on something I haven't even begun to look up? But that is depressing.
And why did you hate the others, by the way? There's a few reasons why people don't like it in my experience.
1. They suck at it.
2. It's too hard.
3. It's not CoD
4. It's not realistic enough. Go play ARMA, then.
Which category do you fall under?
 
I don't really mind Ubisoft's DRM. Worse comes to worse, I'll buy it off Steam. I change computers once every 4-6 years so I don't really need to install it multiple times.
 
Yeah i'm gonna buy it off steam. Once this game is released on steam. it's gonna be big on steam xD!!!!! And Big Period. It's been awhile since I've seen a new ghost recon.
 
sry but tryna get a non valve division here is almost impossible and will say no asap unless its a BF game. Sry to admit the truth but they are gonna say no to Starcraft 2 and everything else too
 
So now I lack common sense because I am asking for a source on something I haven't even begun to look up? But that is depressing.
And why did you hate the others, by the way? There's a few reasons why people don't like it in my experience.
1. They suck at it.
2. It's too hard.
3. It's not CoD
4. It's not realistic enough. Go play ARMA, then.
Which category do you fall under?

Sorry if I offended you, I meant common sense in the way that it has already been implemented in um.. AC2, the new Splinter Cell, Silent Hunter etc so I thought it would be obvious that it would be implemented in this game as well.. they've spent way too much cash to back out now.

As for your other question, it was just generally unappealing to me. It was ugly (graphics-wise), and the controls felt kinda sticky which could be explained by the fact that I did not own a console at that time and was playing at a friends place (Jorz <3). I also got the feeling that the weapons were overpowered but don't take my word for it, I really really don't know.

But thanks for that ArmA suggestion, because that's precisely what I'm playing beside a huge cavalcade of singleplayers and TF2, BC2, MW2 and consolegames. :)
 
Back
Top