Sniper Server

TC (Sniper 4)

I made one post
Joined
Apr 4, 2009
Messages
20
Not that I'm trying to petition to get rid of this server, it just strikes me odd that we have this server when all this nonsense is going on about kalt.

First of all, I rarely see anyone on the sniper server and when I do its a minimal amount of people. I am pretty positive it kept less numbers than kalt( if im wrong let me know), so it is disappointing to see a more popular server in kalt leave than a lesser known server and less popular by what i hear and believe.

Get back to me if you know the reason behind maintaining the sniper server and any comments about this.
 
To my knowledge (And if you know me, knowledge is a pretty loose term with me.), The sniper server is on the same thing-a-mah-bob as some of the TF2 servers, so its much more of a hassle to deal with than just a regular DoD:S server.

Then again, I could just be making this up in my delirious state of sickness
 
Well if thats the case then I can understand keeping it if its too dificult, but in my mind it looks very well worth it to consider removal by looking at the numbers of people on it and theres no reason to keep it when so many people are arguing and petitioning to keep kalt and you could keep argentan as well.

It seems logically but what Im saying probably isnt as easily done as said so get back to me if you confirm that "knowledge". lol
 
To my knowledge (And if you know me, knowledge is a pretty loose term with me.), The sniper server is on the same thing-a-mah-bob as some of the TF2 servers, so its much more of a hassle to deal with than just a regular DoD:S server.

Then again, I could just be making this up in my delirious state of sickness

No your right
By the way other server's are lagging and crashing we wont have any pub's playing soon.

......DoD:S is becoming LaC:s
 
To my knowledge (And if you know me, knowledge is a pretty loose term with me.), The sniper server is on the same thing-a-mah-bob as some of the TF2 servers, so its much more of a hassle to deal with than just a regular DoD:S server.

Then again, I could just be making this up in my delirious state of sickness

a server is a server is a server.... doesnt matter what box its on. It all comes down to takeing the time to remove maps/map lists/configs and create new ones. Its a matter of time, not hassle.
 
a server is a server is a server.... doesnt matter what box its on. It all comes down to takeing the time to remove maps/map lists/configs and create new ones. Its a matter of time, not hassle.

But to hassle with that specific server would hassle TF2, would you want to have to deal with 3 or 4 of our servers lagging terrible for one TF2 map? Personally I vote we give the server to TF2, dont hate me for it, but have more than one empty server at the moment which needs to be resolved quickly.
 
As in a DOD:s Meeting awhile back i believe it was artimus who stated that we wont be getting rid of our sniper server due to its on a TF2 box that we kept so thats the reason why we still have it, and i actually do see people on it, but the maps just need fine tuning IMO, if they would add a few better one's and take out some of the old 1's we are running it might start doing better, also just seed it it also just needs love as well. :)
 
As in a DOD:s Meeting awhile back i believe it was artimus who stated that we wont be getting rid of our sniper server due to its on a TF2 box that we kept so thats the reason why we still have it, and i actually do see people on it, but the maps just need fine tuning IMO, if they would add a few better one's and take out some of the old 1's we are running it might start doing better, also just seed it it also just needs love as well. :)

Do I Feel a poll thread coming on? ;)
 
Oh. My. Goodness.

We should just have a forum section dedicated to complaining about Kalt, and anything related to complaining about Kalt. /sarcasm.

It wasn't my favorite map by any means, but even if it was.. I'd give up mentioning it by now.. what's done is done. Whether Argentan works out or not, now we're going to bring up the sniper server to divert attention from kalt so it's now Sniper server vs Argentan?

OP, I'm not directing this all at you, all though I don't know why such a question needed to be stated as a thread.

I don't even care if you guys depict what I'm saying as being a jerk. Enough is Enough. It's just ridiculous. Kalt, Argentan, sniper server.. When is it going to end?

Every single time a server of ours doesn't do well (Which has happened BEFORE the kalt, Argentan, or sniper servers) we're going to go crazy about it? Just because, for the most part, it was some of yours favorite maps and you thought it did better than the other?

Goodness. I'm not even going to open any thread related to this anymore. Be happy that we have A LOT of great, well populated servers. Stop dwelling on past failed servers, or servers you prematurely declare failed. It's over when it's over.

The lag issues will be fixed soon. you all know leadership is well aware of it. I too am upset about the crash/lag issues, but I've come to the conclusion that it shall pass..

Just like my second tattoo says, 'This too shall pass".. I'm really starting to think a lot of you need that kind of ideology in your head, because it will.

Thats a wrap for me. For what I'm feeling about this situation, and probably what others on the side lines watching on a daily basis are feeling, I'd say I said that pretty politely.
 
Last edited:
Okay a point was brought up on the side that still has not been fixed, and was the cause to kalts death. Our servers are having more and more lag, failure, and shutdown problems then I have ever seen. This needs to be looked at more closely and carefully before we start having bigger problems.

On a side note, before Kalt had the issues it was full near 24/7 I have played on that server for a year or so.... CPTGooba and many others had too..... People stopped because of the problems... You can ask any of the REG pub peeps that did
 

Latest posts

Back
Top