Sega: "We've made too many Sonic games"

Sexy Beast

Poster Extraordinaire
Joined
Apr 23, 2008
Messages
2,641
Sega has released too many Sonic games. In particular, bad ones. It's not just us saying so, this is according to Jurgen Post, SVP of Sega Europe. But the good news is, there's a new internal policy to strive for quality in Sonic games. There's a novel idea. Looks like it's paying off, with Sonic The Hedgehog 4: Episode 1 scoring 9/10 in our review and currently 'all in the green' on Metacritic. But, amazingly, Sega's going further and delisting the crap ones.

'Delisting' means it won't be restocking retailers with new copies, presumably with the likes of 2006 abomination Sonic The Hedgehog and possibly even the half-decent (literally) Sonic Unleashed, so you'll only be able to find those in the pre-owned section or on eBay. Worryingly, it seems they're delisting some great ones too, if Jurgen's statement is to be taken literally:

“We could make a lot of money on back-catalogue Sonic titles, but let’s keep the number of Sonic games available under control. Otherwise you can have cannibalisation. If there are ten Sonic games on the shelves, with people seeing Sonic Rush DS or Sonic Rush Adventure, this may not help our overall strategy.”

The point of the exercise is to increase the value of the brand, which has arguably been diluted to the point of impotence over recent years. Sega's US vice president of sales and marketing, Alan Pritchard, said:

"If you look at all of the Sonic releases over the last four or five years, there's a real mixed bag out there. A Sonic game can sell if it's a 60-percent Metacritic game, that's not an issue. But is that really what the consumer wants? Is that what we should be doing as a publisher and a developer? We should be bringing much higher quality products to market to deliver a better experience for the consumer."

So from now on, we can expect nothing but 80+ metacritic averages for Sonic games. It's working for Sonic 4 Episode 1 (released today on PSN and tomorrow on XBLA in the UK) and looks likely for Sonic Colors on Wii. And with the rumour of a 20th Anniversary fan-pleasing remake on the cards, the future does look bright for the old hog.

Source: http://www.gamesradar.com/ps3/sonic...e/a-201010131591224033/g-20090909115153197035



TL:DR Ver.: Sega's embarrassed by the quality of Sonic games in the past few years and is attempting to purge their back catalog. While also producing higher quality Sonic games.
 
Last edited:
Maybe they had figured that out, but back then they thought that being nice to the customer and making good games wouldn't get them any more sales than they already were, and that hopefully, most customers wouldn't notice that their newer games were worse.
 
hmm another one out yet its not gonna be released on the Sega genesis! NNNNOOOOO!
 
Line up for 2011:

- Sonic XXI

- Final Fantasy MMMMMMMI

- Zelda XIV

- Super Mario XXII

etc...


You know, when the numbers go above 1, the chance the game's gona suck gets very close to 100%



-K^^
 
I disagree.
Especially in VALVe's case. I think the HL2s are better than HL1, Portal 2 looks better than Portal, and I like L4D2 more than L4D.

Also, The Legend of Zelda only used a number once, and that was Zelda II.
 
Back
Top