Fallout: New Vegas

Rukus.

Forum Fanatic
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Messages
976
Love this game (even though I only have it on PS3 :( ) I hope to get the PC version soon and start making a few canon-sensitive (meaning things that won't mess up canon) quests in GECK after I do.

Love how close it is to the first 2 games, unlike fallout 3 (which from now on is to be called Fallout: Capital Wasteland and F:NV is now to be called Fallout 3.
 
Last edited:
fallout 3 (which from now on is to be called Fallout: Capital Wasteland and F:NV is now to be called Fallout 3.


I do not agree with you on this one point. The games never really "sequeled" each other in a sense of matching story lines. 1, 2, and tactics all had different storylines and did epic in selling, i have my original discs and steam copies of them.

Fallout 3 did good because it was a game that did well at what it set out to do. An open world RPG, greatness.

Fallout:NV is very simalar, and i love the gangster themeing btw :P

Though i do not like how much NV relies on crafting things........
 
I do not agree with you on this one point. The games never really "sequeled" each other in a sense of matching story lines. 1, 2, and tactics all had different storylines and did epic in selling, i have my original discs and steam copies of them.

Fallout 3 did good because it was a game that did well at what it set out to do. An open world RPG, greatness.

Fallout:NV is very simalar, and i love the gangster themeing btw :P

Though i do not like how much NV relies on crafting things........

Well, considering FO3 did nothing to the Fallout Universe other than destroy the already seriously worn antagonist Enclave I think NV is a better Fallout sequel. In fact, nv was supposed to be Fallout 3 back when it was called Van Buren.
 
Eh.. Sadly I feel that the games were a bit too similar for me, I guess.. I got bored of New Vegas after around 35 hours of game play. Fallout 3 was far more entertaining to me, but again, I guess they were a bit too similar. Like, if NV came before FO3 I could have potentially got bored of FO3 quickly as well.
 
Last edited:
*stands on top of the cars at Canyon Wreckage (google it)*
Woah....
*at least %50 more wasteland to explore*


Lonesome Road DLC is gunna be epic.
 
Gotta say love both FO3 and NV for their own reasons:

FO3 Likes:
-Urban, big city area
-Beginning felt better than NV when walking out of the V101
-AK47 (Chinese Assault Rifle)
-The DLCs OperAch, Point Lookout, BrokenSteel...
-GNR radio DJ, Three Dog + music

NV Likes:
-Mechanics such as Iron Sights
-Factions
-Better companion interaction
-More weapon choices
-Upgradeable weapons
-Vegas style show music
 
I like NV for the story and dialogue, it wasn't as preposterous as in FO3. But I like FO3 for the game world, it is so beautifully done that you can keep finding something new each play through.

Oblivion and Bethesda working together would produce an awesome game.
 
I didn't really like running amok through a desert in NV, as I much prefered the Capital Wasteland. But I did love a lot of things that NV added that should have been in FO3 in the first place. Iron sights, factions, companion menu, mods for weapons, and even hardcore mode (my fave part of NV).

When I look at Fallout, I think of "survival". Actually having to make sure I'm taking care of myself while exploring gives it that realistic feeling (to me at least). Something I hope they add as an option in upcoming games.
 
I didn't really like how in New Vegas, the main plot ended so fast. I finished it in maybe 8 hours? I didn't start any side missions, and the only companion I had was Rex.
 
In my first playthrough of New Vegas, and at nearly the very beginning of the game itself, I cheated to give myself the necessary caps to enter the Vegas main city. I knew I was cheating, but I didn't realize that the cheating would in turn remove my ability to get any achievements, and so after that discovery, I promptly gave my character all the unique weapons and armors, endless supplies of special bullets, modified my stats and generally wasted the experience. I then set the game down, touched it once three months later, then didn't actually start it up again until a month after that.

The second time was where the game took off for me. The locations, the quests, even just the general feel and atmosphere of the game, made it a great experience and one I'm still going through (still haven't beat Old World Blues, and the Lonesome Road DLC Just dropped.) As with Fallout 3, the sheer size of the game world and all the different things you come across make just wandering around a game in its own right, and then there was the campaign. Those alone gave me around 100 hours played, and then there were the expansions.

The expansions are all amazing quality. Dead Money, Honest Hearts and Old World Blues haven't ceased to each blow me away. DM was a crazed, winding ride, with a payoff of more than I could ever possibly spend (I managed to take all 37 or so gold bars from the vault.) Meanwhile, where Dead Money had its intense, shadowy heist, Honest Hearts had spectacular scenery (Look up pictures of Zion National Park- they recreated it pretty faithfully,) and its human side made it a different, but beautiful experience.

After that is Old World Blues, which even despite my not being done with it, is the best among what are already three great DLCs. It's humor is exactly what I've been told to expect from Fallout, and so far the only game which beats it in making me laugh is Portal 2.

Awesome game. Equally awesome DLC.

On a note on FO3: I very much enjoyed the game, particularly in its powerful setting of the Capital Wasteland. I enjoyed NV more, to be sure. It might be that I think it's a better game, but there's also the chance that I played FO3 as a console gamer, which meant my relative skill and ability to appreciate games both sucked.
 
I played through the entire game without hacking, though second time through I destroyed the entire world with hacking because I like to break games. But anyway: I was disappointed. NV felt slapped together after 3, but that's probably because it borrowed too much story, and it used the same engine and environments.
I can see how some people might want to play through it over and over, but I am a Fallout 3 guy and New Vegas just didn't stand up for me. But if you love it, have at it!
 
After a 100 or more hours into the game I had to stop(the most hours I ever put into a game was battlefield 2142). Sure NV was great, but running through a desert forever and ever just got boring. Old World Blues was by far the best dlc for NV, Lonesome road being pretty close. But all in all NV just got boring.
 
Back
Top