Best GPU ATM

Just to add onto this topic about GPU capabilities. Consoles games will always look better than their PC counterparts because of the API being used namely DirectX.

Take a look at this article and you'll get a better understanding of what I mean.

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/03/21/pcs-are-10x-more-powerful-than-consoles/

http://www.gamepur.com/news/5207-crysis-ps3xbox-360-vs-pc-comparison.html

Crysis PC vs. console


PC wins. The end.



That being said, it's much easier to create a game for one hardware configuration as opposed to a near infinite set of hardware configurations. Keep that in mind.
 
Last edited:
http://www.gamepur.com/news/5207-crysis-ps3xbox-360-vs-pc-comparison.html

Crysis PC vs. console


PC wins. The end.



That being said, it's much easier to create a game for one hardware configuration as opposed to a near infinite set of hardware configurations. Keep that in mind.

Very true about the infinite hardware variations and single console version. Don't get me wrong I'm all about PC, especially when it comes to FPS's, and beefing up my video card, the last console I bothered owning was a PS2. I was merely trying to state that with all the horse power of the PC being updated every 6 months or so it's a shame we aren't getting the full potential of the graphics as the consoles seem to have.
 
@MrDeviant Blame the publishers, not the hardware manufacturers. Granted, the manufacturers work all the time on plug-ins and driver updates, but it's also the publishers who make the decision to use the card's full ability, or half-a** it. With how frequent new cards get released, it's little wonder why a console's graphics "improve" over time; game publishers learn how to use the console's GPU to the fullest extent possible over the time the console exists (~5 years)
 
Correction:

Single GTX 580

-or-

Dual HD 6970's




The 6970's scale better in crossfire, but the GTX 580 is faster as a single card.

And it was the GTX 590 where the voltage regulation went up in smoke. The GTX 580/570 have no such problems and are very good cards.
Wrong
Crossfire creates micro stuttering on the frame rates which will get on your nerves like crazy. The 580 may be slightly more powerful as a single BUT, you'll need two of them or more to do what eyefinity does, which is the only reason you would need a card of that power. SLI has microstuttering.
If you're going to choose which one, consider monitors. If you want the surround/eyefinity get the 6970, if you want one monitor the 580 will give you the needed power. Just remember that the 6970 is a lot cheaper and when it comes down to a single monitor, you're unlikely to see the difference.
 
Wrong
Crossfire creates micro stuttering on the frame rates which will get on your nerves like crazy.

Not an issue with current generation of cards unless you don't have a CPU that can handle the work loads. I don't think you've researched this lately.

The 580 may be slightly more powerful as a single BUT, you'll need two of them or more to do what eyefinity does, which is the only reason you would need a card of that power.

Nvidia has CUDA, 3D, and Physx, while AMD has Eyefinity. Having, an AMD card, I won't disagree with you. However, in order to max games out on a 3 monitor 5760x1080 resolution, I dare say that you're going to probably need a second card to run the games full out without the framerate slowing down. This is especially true of games like Battlefield 3, which is hitting stores within a month. In that respect, I think you haven't thought this through.

Eyefinity is a novelty that very few actually use with only one card. Most people that can afford a good eyefinity/nvidia surround setup can afford a second card.

SLI has microstuttering.

Older/weaker cards do suffer from this. More powerful configurations don't. Again, you're using an outdated model to make this sort of claim.


If you're going to choose which one, consider monitors. If you want the surround/eyefinity get the 6970, if you want one monitor the 580 will give you the needed power. Just remember that the 6970 is a lot cheaper and when it comes down to a single monitor, you're unlikely to see the difference.

HD6900-50.jpg

HD6900-51.jpg


Look at the minimum framerate. The average isn't that much different, but the minimum framerate is about 12 FPS higher average. That would mean that gameplay on the GTX 580 is much smoother, as well as being slightly faster. That steady framerate is very noticeable during heavy firefights.



I maintain what I said earlier. For high-resolution, multi-monitor, multi-card gaming, the Crossfire HD 6970 is the setup to get. Why? It's cheaper and it scales better (more Vram). In the single card, single-monitor sector, the GTX 580 is better. In the triple monitor sector, you need a second card to realize the full potential of most games anyway, so eyefinity becomes nothing more than a perk as opposed to an outright advantage.

I could easily find other examples of this if needed.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top