Can you run BF3, because i can!

This thread seems unnecessary since theres beta information and system specs already posted.
 
Processor: i5 2500k Quad Core @ 3.3 (Will overclock later)
GPU: 2 x 6870s Crossfire
RAM: 8GBs DDR3 1600
HD: 150GB WD VelociRaptor 10,000RPM (May get a SSD later...)

I think I'm good...:P
 
AMD 6 core
ATI Radeon HD 6970 fueled by sapphire. (Plan on getting one more.)

OH YEAH BABY DANCE PARTY!!!!!!!

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfcyQM2C1vQ"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfcyQM2C1vQ[/ame]
 
Yeah I'll be able to run it but not in its intended bliss and glory. I'll need to upgrade to play it like it should be played.
 
For all the hardware, excluding the video card, I meet the standard requirements. I have a SLI Geforce GTX 460 so that, at least, meets the minimum requirements. Huzzah.
 
Probably 90% of the people in the battlefield division can "run" it since bc2 is the most graphic intensive game eGO supports at the moment with the exception of maybe tf2. Although I'm not really sure how World of tanks does on the computer. When I get my new parts this week I should be able to run it close to max if not max.
 
I believe I should be okay. Oddly, this is the first game since I got into computers (~10 years ago) that I've had to even think about the system requirements, and the possibility existed that I may not be able to run the game with all the settings maxed out.

Am running:

Intel Core 2 Quad - 2.83 (Q9550)
4GB Ram
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460
 
I'm running
17 740qm
8 gigs ddr3 1333
and a gtx 460m OC'D to 820 core 1640 shader and 1495 memory

as long as I can have 60fps at 1080p at medium to low ill be happy
 
I want a new card. Seeing everyone talking about their cards make my 9800 GTX+ kinda kick at the dirty.

It's okay, I still luv him.

I was wondering, anyone here favor ATI Radeon cards? I always tend to side with AMD processors just because....no reason at all actually, and didn't know that AMD aquired ATI. Are they good cards compared to nVidia?
 
According to a tweet from Battlefield’s community manager, the equivalent of two Nvidia GeForce 580s are required to play the game visually maxed.

wow. so my 460 is likely too small to even run the game at normal settings...
 
wow. so my 460 is likely too small to even run the game at normal settings...

You'll probably be fine at medium. My 5870 is also cringing at the supposed requirements to play at Ultra settings smoothly. It's apparent that they had the future in mind when they designed this game... same thing happened with BF2.
 
Processor: i7 920 (Overclocked), liquid cooling
GPU: 2 x 5870s Crossfire (should be able to run this on max settings )
RAM: 12GBs DDR3 1333
 
According to a tweet from Battlefield?s community manager, the equivalent of two Nvidia GeForce 580s are required to play the game visually maxed.
wow. so my 460 is likely too small to even run the game at normal settings...


:O

lemme pull $950+ out of my broke ***
 
I'm pretty sure my system can run it well, but I think my graphics card will be holding me back. Have an i7 960 @ 3.2 Ghz w/ 8GB RAM, but my graphics card is a 5750 =P
 
Last edited:
Back
Top