What Goes Around Comes Around, Apple

Snipeye

EGO Is My Life!
=(e)=
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
4,867
VIA Wants iPad, iPhone Banned in USA
9:00 PM - September 22, 2011 - By Kevin Parrish -

Apple's iPad, iPhone, iPod Touch and Apple TV supposedly infringe upon three patents owned by VIA Technologies. VIA is asking the court to halt sales of those products.

What goes around come around. Apple just won a battle against Samsung which resulted in the banning of the latter company's Android-based Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Germany. The German courts agreed with the fruity iPad developer in that the company owns exclusive rights to minimalist tablet designs (and apparently Stanley Kubrick does not). Citing patent infringement, the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 cannot be imported or sold within the German borders.

But now Apple is facing a patent infringement lawsuit filed against it by Taipei-based motherboard, CPU, and chipset maker VIA Technologies, Inc. Submitted to the U.S. Federal Court in Wilmington, Delaware, VIA is crying patent infringement (who isn't anymore) and seeking a jury trial along with a plea to the court to ban the sale of Apple's iPad, iPhone, iPod and Apple TV products.

According to the lawsuit, these devices infringe upon three of its U.S.-based patents -- two filed in 2001 and the third in 2004 -- that "generally provides efficient loading of data in the microprocessors and efficient conversion and transfer of data in the microprocessors." The three patents specifically cover a technical "instruction set for bi-directional conversion and transfer of integer and floating point data" and "method and apparatus for double operand load."

"Microprocessors that include this technology can rapidly load data from memory, directly move data between floating point and integer registers, and rapidly convert data from one another, thereby increasing the operational speed of the microprocessors," VIA said in its suit.

Unfortunately, Apple may have a tough battle ahead. The Delaware Court is supposedly known as a "plaintiff-friendly region," similar to the Eastern District Federal Court of Texas. Banning the sale of Apple products seems a little far-fetched, but if anything, the Cupertino company may have to shell out some big bucks if found guilty.

Timing of the complaint isn't coincidental. Apple is reportedly gearing up to reveal the iPhone 4S on October 4 along with the new iPod Touch model and perhaps even the rumored iPhone 5. A temporary injunction barring Apple from selling "infringing products" would cripple Apple's pre-holiday season sales.

http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Patent-...Touch-Delaware-floating-point,news-12629.html
 
I seriously don't understand why VIA would go after apple. They are just going to settle or loose. An injunction like what happened in the EU is not going to happen in america without some MAJOR LY long legal battle that will probably cost VIA more than they would make.

VIA also just completely screwed over any chance they ever had of apple using their products.

Why would you want to anger the worlds largest tech company?

I seriously thing all this "patent infringement" is a bunch of bull......dung.
 
Personally, I think Apple has annoyed/pissed off enough tech companies that they're all now seeing red. Apple sued Samsung and got the Galaxy Tab blocked from Germany, and Netherlands(?). Samsung is now countering by initiating lawsuits in South Korea, Japan, and Australia to ban Iphone 3, 4 and iPad and iPad 2 sales (and most likely the iPhone 5 too). VIA is suing Apple to ban iPhone sales in the US. Samsung is also counter-suing Apple in Europe. Google is shoring up its legal team with patents, releasing patents for use/sale to Android manufacturers. HTC is counter-suing Apple for patent infringement. The only company that's going to gain anything from this is Microsoft, and that's just by sticking to the sidelines and not to take any side.

It's a huge lawsuit mess, and if there were any sane judges and patent system, all companies involved would be fined, a LARGE number of patents would be ruled to belong to the public and free to use (seriously, a patent on a rectangular object to view stuff and a patent on the wireless technology that all phone makers use...). And customers will be allowed to decide what products they want to buy or not, and not a company lawsuit.

And I don't think any of that will come about, but that's just an example of this huge patent troll mess that we allowed to come about.

Disclaimer: I'm not an Apple fan, so my views may be skewed (more or less likely).
 

Latest posts

Back
Top