*Sigh*

[RandyOglestein]

This guy's thread is so full of fail that there is no appropriate amount of /facepalm.

http://forum.ea.com/eaforum/posts/list/7558428.page

He claims that the only reason/main reason Battlefield 3 will have 64-player Conquest on PC is because PC gamers "QQ'ed" about it.

He obviously doesn't understand that Battlefield STARTED on PC, with 64 players, and only conquest.

[ame]http://www.flickr.com/photos/37154289@N05/3540184810/[/ame]
[ame]http://www.flickr.com/photos/37154289@N05/3540184810/[/ame] by Svimen, on Flickr

 

[Darth]

*Sigh*

This guys thread is so full of fail because he posted it twice.

 

[RandyOglestein]

Dunno how I double thread posted =(. Sorry. Feel free to close this one

 

[RAINBoWToAST]

*Sigh*

This guys thread is so full of fail because he posted it twice.

I just had dinner with the guy on the right (Jonathan Frakes) last night.

 

[h987654321]

Thank you for bringing fail on to the eGO forums.

 

[PBJ]

Wow...some people these days...

 

[iEye Captain]

People posting stupid things?

Welcome to the Internet.

 

[PBJ]

The thing that truly made me laugh was that both of the people arguing that DICE is favoring PCs (they should for once, after the BC's...) both have MW2 or MW3 avatars or signatures. It amuses me why they'd even care.

 

[InkSix]

Suffer Not the Ignorant.