Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter considering ?nuclear option? to protest SOPA

Snipeye

EGO Is My Life!
=(e)=
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
4,867
Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Twitter considering ?nuclear option? to protest SOPA
By Joel Hruska on January 3, 2012 at 12:00 pm

The battle against SOPA reached fever pitch just before Christmas when a Reddit-led boycott of Go Daddy over the domain registrar?s support for the controversial legislation led to some 37,000 domains leaving the company for greener, freedom-loving pastures. Go Daddy, meanwhile, is now buried in complaints that it?s improperly blocking domain transfer requests to rival Namecheap.

With debate over SOPA?s future tabled until Congress reconvenes, you might think the issue would have entered a similar lull, but that?s not happened. According to Markham Erickson, head of the NetCoalition trade association, there?s been talk of a so-called ?nuclear option,? in which the likes of Google, Amazon, eBay, and Yahoo! would go simultaneously dark to protest the legislation to highlight the fundamental danger the legislation poses to the function of the internet.

There?s been no formal decision on the matter, and the companies in question obviously risk consumer anger and backlash over any suspension of services. There is, however, safety in numbers ? and a few simple sentences identifying why the blackout is in place will ensure that the majority of the rage flows in the proper direction.

It?s a trump card that the likes of the MPAA and RIAA have no way of matching. There?s solid technical data behind the tech industry?s claims that implementing SOPA could damage the function of the internet, and plenty of evidence (some of it just weeks old) that copyright holders will abuse existing judicial processes to eliminate content they don?t like. The MPAA and RIAA are willing to talk about jobs lost to piracy in the abstract, but won?t (and can?t) promise that passing SOPA will allow them to hire thousands of Americans or create jobs in a statement they?d be held accountable for fulfilling.

There?s no information yet on when the blackout would occur, but the most likely date right now would be January 23. The Senate is scheduled to debate SOPA on January 24. Speaking in December, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid highlighted the importance of passing the legislation. ?This is a bipartisan piece of legislation which is extremely important,? Reid said Saturday. ?I repeat, it is bipartisan. I hope we can have a productive couple of days, pass this bill, and move on to other matters.?

http://www.extremetech.com/computin...er-considering-nuclear-option-to-protest-sopa

I'm going to point this out to everyone as it is important AND can affect you. If tech companies decide to protest, the Internet may not be working properly for you on January 23. Google, eBay, Facebook, Twitter, Youtube: All these sites may be down on that day.

Please look into what SOPA means and what it represents. If it's something that you feel strongly for or against, please notify your representative or senator. One of the more extreme examples about what SOPA could do to us gamers: Game reviews and walkthroughs showing gameplay would not be allowed under SOPA due to how broadly and loosely the law is written. I.E. No video game streaming (like Terraria last night) allowed without prior consent from companies that created the game. I keep looking into the law, and where I can't 100% say that those examples are true, I really do not see anything to make them false either, which is worrying.

Please try to keep this discussion thread civil as this is a pretty explosive topic. Thanks in advance.
 
I'm guessing it will probably get veto'd and thrown in the trash.
 
So basically said sites would show the people what SOPA would do to the internet? I completely agree with this if that is the purpose.
 
The majority of the internet as we know it now, would be removed. I hope they carry through with the demo.
 
I'm guessing it will probably get veto'd and thrown in the trash.

Who knows. Based off the number of sponsors of this bill and PIPA, they both have about 30 and 40 sponsors, and they're really bipartisan. You got democrats and republicans both supporting and opposing the bills as of Dec 17 (most recent record I could find) With the way Congress has their heads shoved up their own rears, I'm not going to assume anything done in the interest of sanity.
 
I seriously doubt the President is going to allow SOPA to go through if it's threatening this sort of nonsense. Even more-so, I can't see him passing this into law only months before a crucial re-election campaign where a thing like SOPA will hinder hopes of reaching a maximum audience.

He's already made threats to veto this garbage

http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-v...eto-resolution-repealing-net-neutrality-rules

This sort of thing irks me SO MUCH!
 
"Overcoming a presidential veto would require a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress."

This is what worries me, fps.
 
I seriously doubt the President is going to allow SOPA to go through if it's threatening this sort of nonsense. Even more-so, I can't see him passing this into law only months before a crucial re-election campaign where a thing like SOPA will hinder hopes of reaching a maximum audience.

He's already made threats to veto this garbage

http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-v...eto-resolution-repealing-net-neutrality-rules

This sort of thing irks me SO MUCH!

Not trying to bash the president or anything, but he's already signed law's removing freedom's. I wouldnt put your trust in the president to try and veto anything..
 
Naw, I like this president as much as I like liver and onions (I don't), but I really don't think this will fly. It worries me too that the Congress can overthrow the veto, but I just can't see this happening.

I've been surprised before, though. Crossing my fingers it reaches as far as the waste bin.
 
It worries me too that the Congress can overthrow the veto, but I just can't see this happening.

Checks and balances yo.

I don't think they will go on a blackout. What i can see happening is those sites posting information on SOPA on their front pages like that one video.
 
I seriously doubt the President is going to allow SOPA to go through if it's threatening this sort of nonsense. Even more-so, I can't see him passing this into law only months before a crucial re-election campaign where a thing like SOPA will hinder hopes of reaching a maximum audience.

He's already made threats to veto this garbage

Obama Signs Defense Authorization Bill

The White House had originally threatened to veto the $662 billion bill, considered must-pass legislation...

I wouldn't put much weight on his "threats to veto this garbage."

Further reading: Three myths about the detention bill
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top