Anzio - MG

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is an outrage! How dare you restrict MGs.
Agreed. Are snipers going to be restricted too? It would only make sense since the sniper class is the answer to the MG's ability to suppress.

Leave to Compton and Stormy (and now me) to stir up the pot a little more. How about rifles and support only, the only two respectable classes;)
 
Paper and Scissors only! End RockSpam!

I'm soooooo tired of Rocks crushing my Sissors.... (stupid Rock just sitting there) ... "I"only throw Scissors... I would never throw ... Paper (ewww)! People who play with me should only use Paper (sorry , i got the only Scissors) ... ( BTW, what kinda loser plays Rock and Paper ? pffftttt!)

OH yeah... maybe we should ban snipers... if you are such a good shot , you can use a garand/KAR... do we REALLY need TWO bolt-action classes?

This game is just a big version of rock,paper, sicssors. Special classes must be limited/ratio'd on equal basis.

War is assymetrical. Nations do not attack when technology is balanced. (Read Sun-Tzu Art of War). You attack when and where you enemy is weak. War is mindnumbing monotomy, puncuated by sheer terror. Grenades and MG's are the terror machines of the modern world ... you cannot wish them away.
 
Its a shame that you did not read through this thread before posting...We have stated multiple times that this change is being applied to mg class only on a single server and there are no plans to expand on it, nor will there be any.

This is a serious matter that leadership treats as such. It would be appreciated if the rest of you treat it in the same vein and leave the sarcasm at the metaphorical door.

-Blue

OH yeah... maybe we should ban snipers... if you are such a good shot , you can use a garand/KAR... do we REALLY need TWO bolt-action classes?
 
Last edited:
It is foolish to play MG on servers with less than 20 players. There are not enough players to break up into sub-units for protection of the MG. As the MG player will be easily flanked, the game mechanics take into account the "rock paper sissor" effect. No futher balance is neccessary.

How can you be against BOTH Ramboing AND camping. Your biased tirade against MGSPAM, fails the "straight face" test.

If what you want here is rubber stamp approval of your plan. You aren't going to get it.

BUT, if you want to set minimums for all special weapons, sounds like we could get behind you. Its is compleatly unneccessary.

Blue, I read the whole thread, you do not need to "shame me". My response was couched in humor. From our previous communications, it seems you have some issue with keeping it light and in perspective. Lighten up , kiddo, its just a game... Your not really a general, and your not sending anyone to Fort Levenworth.

While I love eGO... if you ask pubs why they wont join us... it's complaints about our heavyhanded and arbitrary leadership, not our MG's.

Jim Meehan
Armor Crewman 1990-1992
 
Much of your post has nothing to do with the topic at hand so I will not address it. I ask of you that if you have personal problems with me or my leadership that you contact me directly.

Back on topic, I do not recall making any statement supporting or advising against camping or rambo'ing. If you could point out specific instances where I have, it would be appreciated.

I also do not remember asking for a "rubber stamp of approval" from you, or anyone else. If anything, I have in fact encouraged opinions against my arguments and you can indeed find specific examples of that in this thread.

Lastly, i will say again that this mg change is not going to be allied to other classes, nor are they being applied to other servers. Not now, and not in the near or foreseeable future.

-Blue

It is foolish to play MG on servers with less than 20 players. There are not enough players to break up into sub-units for protection of the MG. As the MG player will be easily flanked, the game mechanics take into account the "rock paper sissor" effect. No futher balance is neccessary.

How can you be against BOTH Ramboing AND camping. Your biased tirade against MGSPAM, fails the "straight face" test.

If what you want here is rubber stamp approval of your plan. You aren't going to get it.

BUT, if you want to set minimums for all special weapons, sounds like we could get behind you. Its is compleatly unneccessary.

Blue, I read the whole thread, you do not need to "shame me". My response was couched in humor. From our previous communications, it seems you have some issue with keeping it light and in perspective. Lighten up , kiddo, its just a game... Your not really a general, and your not sending anyone to Fort Levenworth.

While I love eGO... if you ask pubs why they wont join us... it's complaints about our heavyhanded and arbitrary leadership, not our MG's.

Jim Meehan
Armor Crewman 1990-1992
 
This was supposed to be a informative post letting everybody know that the MG class will be restricted. I can understand some of these arguments that have happened here, but the constant bickering back and forth is not needed. This thread is now closed, if you have any further complaints/suggestions please send a member of leadership a pm or post in the dropbox.

Thanks,
-lung
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top