MoH whos side are you on

MoH <= Battlefield 3

Same engine, but less content :(

Actually Medal of Honor really started the first person shooter of the new age of gaming. Followed by Battlefield and then finally by Call of Duty
Also, its MOH = BF3 because you have to remember the original MOH came out way before Battlefield 1942 by at least 2 years and COD came out a year after BF.

The less content well, we'll have to see we don't know the full extent of MOH:WF yet

As for now this game is on the hold off till I see more content, but I bet I will be getting it. I need something else besides the repetitive Battlefield

And I would go for any of them, that's who's side I am on
 
I never meant to say that MoH the series, was less than BF series....

This most recent MoH that they are releasing, is run on the same engine as BF3 (frostbite 2). However, they have only focused on gun play, so, it'll be a CQB bf3 only type gameplay. This MoH release will be the same, or worse (because not as much open vehicle fighting) as BF3.
 
vehicle fighting, what is that?

Operation metro, vehicle fighting, huh IDK about that

2010's MOH was fun it had many game modes but the support was never there and that's why it failed
The point abilities as you progress through the MP were fun to use, its nothing like the COD, but more of a defensive/offensive choice by earning points for everything you do in-game. For some reason the it was never a campfest for me. Snipers were frequent yes but the ability to spawn in random locations and able to move and not clustered all the time made it an enjoyable game as well.

"As for now this game is on the hold off till I see more content, but I bet I will be getting it."
 
I know for a fact I will be getting it. I'm going to preorder the Limited Edition end of this week.
 
Back
Top