Tech Help New PC build

That's a great build. There's always room for improvement, but that will be determined by your budget.

If you want my advice, everything look sweet. But I would add two Samsung Pro SSD's. At least 128GB each in a RAID 0 for the OS and productivity software. I'd use the Intel 750 Series for just my games. Maybe at least an 980 GPU for future games but a 970 is great. Unless you wanted to add a sli setup, your PSU is more than enough. But this is my opinion and what you have there is pretty awesome and will rock bro. Now jump into B4 so I can take your dog tags. :)
 
What Wize said, the 970 has been out over a year now, so it would probably pay to wait it out just a little bit longer.
 
Yeah! I'd wait for the new Pascal cards to come out as they will force the other cards to drop in price.
 
Also I would suggest not going SLI since most games have issues with SLI.
 
wait for the newer GFX cards to come

For price drop or for performance on newer cards? The 970 seems adequate for what I am trying to do but with the price of the cards I can see both being an option.
 
Last edited:
That's a great build. There's always room for improvement, but that will be determined by your budget.

If you want my advice, everything look sweet. But I would add two Samsung Pro SSD's. At least 128GB each in a RAID 0 for the OS and productivity software. I'd use the Intel 750 Series for just my games. Maybe at least an 980 GPU for future games but a 970 is great. Unless you wanted to add a sli setup, your PSU is more than enough. But this is my opinion and what you have there is pretty awesome and will rock bro. Now jump into B4 so I can take your dog tags. :)

Yeah been meaning to get back into battlefield, just rough when you play 20 games at the same time. Sorry for the late reply had to do some things yesterday but thanks for the advice.

Also not sure on raid, last time I had raid, it caused my computer to blue screen after a year or so. I am sure it improves performance just had bad experience with it in the past.
 
For price drop or for performance on newer cards? The 970 seems adequate for what I am trying to do but with the price of the cards I can see both being an option.

Seeing that you are going sli, I would wait for the newer cards with HBM. This way you won't running into issues of games that not optimised for dual cards and you will enough VRAM run games on
 
Be warned - a long discussion on SLI Setups.

Also I would suggest not going SLI since most games have issues with SLI.

Well, I personally haven't had any problems with any of my games in SLI. Though you will have to tweak each game to avoid any issues if you have the time. It doesn't take that long to make some adjustments. Now some people don't like or have time to tweak their games so yes, I agree with Wize that not all games will utilize SLI and you may encounter what's called stutter in your games. But that is very minimal as your performance will either double to triple in FPS. But also, with two cards, you will use more power and it will create more heat as well.

If you have money to burn and don't mind tweaking your games as most gamers enjoy doing, then go SLI. But if you want to be more practical, purchase the highest grade single graphics card you can afford. I wouldn't purchase anything less than a 970 as Nvidia has changed the architecture of the Maxwell Chipset of all cards from 970 and higher which makes the cards more efficient, less power draw and better rendering performance. Also I'd recommend either MSI, Asus or EVGA as these card manufacturers have the best heat pipes and cooling hardware on them.

Then as time goes by like after 4+ years and as newer games come out that will require more processing power, you can go SLI to play those games. And the first card you purchased; after 4+ years, will have declined dramatically in price allowing you to go SLI to keep up with the next generation of games.

Here is the latest link to the latest games that are using a SLI setup. It's not required to go SLI to play these games, but if your heavy into eyeball candy and want to play all your games at the Ultra Settings, then SLI is a must.

These are the 2014 games that will utilize SLI.
http://www.game-debate.com/news/?ne...List Of Compatible NVIDIA SLI Supported Games

You can check out the lastest games that SLI will work with at Nvidia.com
http://www.geforce.com/games-applications/technology/sli

Here's a true fact with SLI. 99.4% of the games you play will never use 100% of the ram on a card including the maximum power draw. So from extensive research, you will rarely see any stutter or problems in SLI with all the games offered today. It's when you push your cards beyond the graphic resolutions of 4k and new 5k monitors that are going beyond the 4096x2160 native resolutions, that's when you will see problems in SLI from pushing the card more than it can handle.

But it's personal preference. I've been using SLI for over 12 years and haven't had any issues with my SLI setup and the performance is outstanding. But I enjoy extreme clarity and play at 1920x1200 resolutions. Until my LCD monitor gets replaced, then my next monitor may be pushing towards the newer 5k world when I can truly utilize SLI at it's best.

I hope this helps you out and clarifies this topic for you. I research constantly on all my computer parts cause I'm an extreme over-clocker and am always striving for the best temperatures and consistent frame rates that I can achieve. I tend to push the limits in OC by not only pushing my processor and ram but also my chipset, PCIE Lanes being used and voltage regulators. I use to be a heavy benchmark competitor before I got into gaming. But now I'm burned-out of benchmarking and back into gaming, I still dabble with my settings. It's a hobby and it gratifies me. You don't need to go to extremes like me to enjoy great gaming. And in many cases it's a waste of time and dangerous as well. It's just me and it excites me to still be able to do that.

Good luck with your decision and I'll see you on the front lines. ;)

P.S. A word of advice, you should use your monitors maximum resolution it supports for the truest clarity in your games. Now, most monitors can be set at 1080p (1920x1080P), but if the monitor can go beyond that resolution, then don't use 1080P. Movies is one thing, but in games it's a totally different world. 1080P will create better game play, but the graphics clarity will suffer tremendously. Where as if you play at 16:10(1920x1200), your adding 120 more pixels to your games and it will increase your graphical clarity. But if your in the 4k world, then your most likely not playing at these lower levels as long as you don't push your graphic cards beyond the monitors capacity.:thumbup1:
 
Yeah been meaning to get back into battlefield, just rough when you play 20 games at the same time. Sorry for the late reply had to do some things yesterday but thanks for the advice.

Also not sure on raid, last time I had raid, it caused my computer to blue screen after a year or so. I am sure it improves performance just had bad experience with it in the past.

BSOD's aren't usually caused by RAID setups. I've never heard of that. Not saying that it can cause it. My old computer that I replaced, didn't use RAID and after 3+ years of use, I started to get those BSOD's during game play as well as computer resets. It ended up being my PSU starting to fail.

Many BSOD's are caused by software issue installs as well as dieing power supplies, graphic cards, hard drives and sometimes ram.

So from my past experience with RAID setups; which I'm using now with my new build, I've never pinpointed any BSOD's within the RAID setup.
 
BSOD's aren't usually caused by RAID setups. I've never heard of that. Not saying that it can cause it. My old computer that I replaced, didn't use RAID and after 3+ years of use, I started to get those BSOD's during game play as well as computer resets. It ended up being my PSU starting to fail.

Many BSOD's are caused by software issue installs as well as dieing power supplies, graphic cards, hard drives and sometimes ram.

So from my past experience with RAID setups; which I'm using now with my new build, I've never pinpointed any BSOD's within the RAID setup.

If I remember correctly (it's been about eight years since I used raid last) It had to do with reformatting causing the raid to break. The separation of the hard drives prevented both from being readable not allowing me to install a new operating system on either. It was a simple matter of getting new hard drives to get it to work again. So it is always possible the issue was underlying in the hard drives themselves or just improper process that caused the damage.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top