Should BF4 24/7 Shanghai have a rule restricting the levolution of the tower(C Flag)?

[Dr. Havok]

Should BF4 24/7 Shanghai have a rule restricting the levolution of the tower(C Flag)?
If you have an idea for a poll, please submit poll suggestions here: http://www.edge-gamers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=125088 :thumbup:​

 

[Misterboy]

Restricting the levolution would not go well with the players and would be too much of a hassle to try and admin. I say leave it as is.

 

[Swampfox5000]

It would be a Admin Nightmare to figure Who took it down to early, leave it as is.

 

[He@d$hoT]

Agreed, and it would feel wrong banning someone for playing the game the way it was created.

 

[TheMajeye]

Play the game how it was intended.

Leave it the way it is.

 

[bottleoftheFUNK]

No, even though I don't ever play that server. I really do not like it when a server restricts aspects of a game because a small portion of the users get upset about something they can't control in-game. Plus the server is usually full all the time anyway, don't fix what isn't broken.

 

[Aetos17]

Love to see it stay up, but good luck enforcing.

 

[MacArther]

While I dislike being sniped from the tower, I also acknowledge that this is an OK play style. Leave the levelution as is.

 

[Daa]

Server is fine as it is, if you change it, you have a chance of losing players. Keep it the way that it is, the game is made for it to come down. If it comes down right away, cool. If it doesn't, oh well.

 

[Slash]

Leave it like it is.

If you guys want it to stay up, put it on the event server or metro server....

 

[Simon]

Wow, there is an overwhelming no in the voting so far. I'm glad we did put this to public debate, after so much discussion last week

 

[k0ala]

Guys, guys...
you don't need to worry about this, we're just overthinking. Everyone will play BF1 instead of BF4.
So what's all the conflict here? Just keep it like it is, there's gonna be no one on the BF4 servers, thus no one will care

 

[Beluga_Soup]

Leave it

 

[ALm0sT_]

I feel like the levolution balances the map. If a team is camping in the tower, the levolution can give the losing team a chance at taking the flag once the tower is down and getting back into the game.

 

[UstillSuk]

Telling other players what they can or cannot due with taking the tower down will not go well. Leave as is.

 

[CrossCheck]

Guys, guys...
you don't need to worry about this, we're just overthinking. Everyone will play BF1 instead of BF4.
So what's all the conflict here? Just keep it like it is, there's gonna be no one on the BF4 servers, thus no one will care

There will be people who still play bf4 after BF1 comes out. There are people who still play BF3 and BC2.

 

[DarkRaven]

Levelution is not just the tower for shanghai. It is everything you do and would be hard to implement even with a plugin. I mean everything is levelution from knocking over trash cans and light poles, breaking through walls, damaging vehicles, and yes taking down the tower. EA built the levelution to change the style of gameplay. While the tower up provides sniper and rocket engineers to take out choppers while down it provides the boat to help with vehicles and chopper. Now is it annoying sometimes when players take it down right away in the beginning yes but then you just need a better strategy to take out the tanks and choppers. It would be too hard to enforce as others have mentioned as you have many variables which can take down the pillars including tanks, choppers, engineers, those with c4, and sometimes destruction from vehicles running into the pillars.

 

[Michael Bolton]

Guys, guys...
you don't need to worry about this, we're just overthinking. Everyone will play BF1 instead of BF4.
So what's all the conflict here? Just keep it like it is, there's gonna be no one on the BF4 servers, thus no one will care

The realest post in this thread goes to k0ala!