- Joined
- Apr 22, 2008
- Messages
- 345
I have a prologue, and then 3 questions.
Say "player1" joins and happens to randomly be assigned to a team (let's call it RED) that has walked through the other team (BLUE, obviously) maybe 2 or 3 times in a row.
[Side note, player1 might have been able to join directly to the dominating team because a certain unnamed person might have magnanimously switched teams from RED to BLUE to help out the losing team a bit right before player1 connected]
Now, say player1 stays on team RED through maybe one additional dominating victory, then is AUTOSWITCHED to BLUE.
And what if player1 then proceeded to join spectator before playing a single minute as BLUE, to wait for another player to connect and hoin the now minority BLUE team, then to rejoin team RED.
Say all of this played out very obviously within a span (from the point of the AUTOSWITCH to the rejoining of RED) in about 45 seconds.
As an =(e)=, if I saw player1 very obviously demonstrating this behavior, would I be within my rights and responsibilities to either bring this up with admins present or admonish player1 discreetly?
And a second, related question: if player1 was an =(eGO)= admin (TOTALLY hypothetical, mkay), would I, as an =(e)= be expected to say and do nothing in the name of solidarity?
Lastly, If there was a hypothetical =(eGO)=player1 behaving in this manner, should us =(e)=s do as we usually do--take this behavior as a shining example of what we all strive for and could one day become?
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Indryd
Say "player1" joins and happens to randomly be assigned to a team (let's call it RED) that has walked through the other team (BLUE, obviously) maybe 2 or 3 times in a row.
[Side note, player1 might have been able to join directly to the dominating team because a certain unnamed person might have magnanimously switched teams from RED to BLUE to help out the losing team a bit right before player1 connected]
Now, say player1 stays on team RED through maybe one additional dominating victory, then is AUTOSWITCHED to BLUE.
And what if player1 then proceeded to join spectator before playing a single minute as BLUE, to wait for another player to connect and hoin the now minority BLUE team, then to rejoin team RED.
Say all of this played out very obviously within a span (from the point of the AUTOSWITCH to the rejoining of RED) in about 45 seconds.
As an =(e)=, if I saw player1 very obviously demonstrating this behavior, would I be within my rights and responsibilities to either bring this up with admins present or admonish player1 discreetly?
And a second, related question: if player1 was an =(eGO)= admin (TOTALLY hypothetical, mkay), would I, as an =(e)= be expected to say and do nothing in the name of solidarity?
Lastly, If there was a hypothetical =(eGO)=player1 behaving in this manner, should us =(e)=s do as we usually do--take this behavior as a shining example of what we all strive for and could one day become?
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Indryd



















lol