Counter-Strike Global Offensive Jail Server Ok, but what if you could ban for toxicity

[Buster]

haha...uhmmm...im not toxic, just...haha...having a bad day

I hope you don’t expect wavie to enforce toxicity.

 

[Wavie]

I hope you don’t expect wavie to enforce toxicity.

BRUH i enforce it, i just warn them xD

 

[ImACherrys]

So, here's another suggestion that somebody will probably find a fault to in the comments, but whatever.

What if admins could ct ban people/kick people/whatever for toxicity?

Also I get that this is just hypocrisy from my point of view since I'm super toxic, but I don't care, JB needs to be less toxic. People will stay on the server if they don't get killed for taking like one step out of the marker by a toxic CT named "acidy" or whatever.

Admins would be the ones judging for toxicity, and they have good judgment because the CS managers have picked them for their reasonability, or at least I hope that's how Managers pick their admins.

Idk just tell me your thoughts in the comments.

ACIDITY, TOXICITY CANNOT BE PREVENTED, IT BASICALLY MADE THE GAMING COMMUNITY, plus if admins judged if something was toxic or not they could abuse the power to dictate whether or not if they deserve a kick. You might be saying " wHy WoUlD aDmInS aBuSe?" could be a possibility, plus if you add this thing in, admins will be like "oh I have another set of powers, especially a power that can dictate whether or not I can kick people for being toxic, which is around the whole internet" wut im trynna say is that toxicity cannot be prevented or lowered, just let it be, theres no stoppin it

 

[sabo]

ACIDITY, TOXICITY CANNOT BE PREVENTED, IT BASICALLY MADE THE GAMING COMMUNITY, plus if admins judged if something was toxic or not they could abuse the power to dictate whether or not if they deserve a kick. You might be saying " wHy WoUlD aDmInS aBuSe?" could be a possibility, plus if you add this thing in, admins will be like "oh I have another set of powers, especially a power that can dictate whether or not I can kick people for being toxic, which is around the whole internet" wut im trynna say is that toxicity cannot be prevented or lowered, just let it be, theres no stoppin it

but with this admin power in action, toxicity can be lowered, thats literally the entire point of it cherrys

 

[ImACherrys]

but with this admin power in action, toxicity can be lowered, thats literally the entire point of it cherrys

But lowering the toxicity will make the toxic people even more toxic

 

[ImACherrys]

but with this admin power in action, toxicity can be lowered, thats literally the entire point of it cherrys

Just think about it like this, you cannot lower something that is surrounding the whole internet, toxicity is basically what made the gaming community a thing. " but with this admin power in action, toxicity can be lowered, " yes I can see some admins doing this but some admins dont even do their job, most admins on JB don't do anything about it but when it happens to them, they just make it seem like they just committed a crime or some shit

 

[Raztoki]

100% agree except for the fact that admins will abuse it even harder. Remember when a certain somebody banned someone for "dirtbag"? Or banned someone for 2 weeks for calling him a dweeb? Most of the overly toxic people end up being banned or playing less. Every few months it seems to bring in a new wave. Simplord hasn't been on for a while, VC never plays, rainy stopped playing a while ago, Wooby stopped playing, etc

 

[Simon]

ACIDITY, TOXICITY CANNOT BE PREVENTED, IT BASICALLY MADE THE GAMING COMMUNITY, plus if admins judged if something was toxic or not they could abuse the power to dictate whether or not if they deserve a kick. You might be saying " wHy WoUlD aDmInS aBuSe?" could be a possibility, plus if you add this thing in, admins will be like "oh I have another set of powers, especially a power that can dictate whether or not I can kick people for being toxic, which is around the whole internet" wut im trynna say is that toxicity cannot be prevented or lowered, just let it be, theres no stoppin it

I don’t think that’s true. The gaming community was not founded on toxicity. The last few years the attitude has gotten worse. It wasn’t always like this.

100% agree except for the fact that admins will abuse it even harder. Remember when a certain somebody banned someone for "dirtbag"? Or banned someone for 2 weeks for calling him a dweeb? Most of the overly toxic people end up being banned or playing less. Every few months it seems to bring in a new wave. Simplord hasn't been on for a while, VC never plays, rainy stopped playing a while ago, Wooby stopped playing, etc

Admins who do this need to be reported to leadership.

 

[sabo]

But lowering the toxicity will make the toxic people even more toxic

perm ban them ezpz

 

[sabo]

Just think about it like this, you cannot lower something that is surrounding the whole internet, toxicity is basically what made the gaming community a thing. " but with this admin power in action, toxicity can be lowered, " yes I can see some admins doing this but some admins dont even do their job, most admins on JB don't do anything about it but when it happens to them, they just make it seem like they just committed a crime or some shit

yeah, but this can be a step to keep admins on high alert for toxicity which'll make less of them show the attitude you said in your message

 

[sabo]

100% agree except for the fact that admins will abuse it even harder. Remember when a certain somebody banned someone for "dirtbag"? Or banned someone for 2 weeks for calling him a dweeb? Most of the overly toxic people end up being banned or playing less. Every few months it seems to bring in a new wave. Simplord hasn't been on for a while, VC never plays, rainy stopped playing a while ago, Wooby stopped playing, etc

but like is that a bad thing?

 

[WaSe]

There's two different types of toxicity. Toxicity because you're scared of the round going to hell, and toxicity to be a prick.
The latter is punishable.

 

[sabo]

There's two different types of toxicity. Toxicity because you're scared of the round going to hell, and toxicity to be a prick.
The latter is punishable.

then why don't any admins use that power?

 

[Ouzi]

sometimes toxicity is good cuz round progresses faster.. . .. .. . i said it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

[peoples]

If a guard is going out of their way to ruin the experience of others by being “toxic”, they can/will be banned. This has and will be a rule forever.

 

[raddood6]

toxicity sucks i know im a toxic ass but sometimes some people go way too toxic

 

[kuantum]

shiiiiit man

we are all saying it's a rule and whatnot but the hardest part of banning for something as vague as toxicity is that we have to provide "enough" proof. i never carry a lot of evidence for one specific person and mainly it just feels like witch hunting looking for those "slip ups", LE and some confident AT's get to do this without much questioning (LE has access to proof and AT's are well trusted enough as a group).

we have the power to do it, but what's the point of placing this ban if it's just going to be reverted in 48 hours because "this evidence is insufficient/not really that toxic/doesn't break rules/doesn't technically break enough rules for this ban to be this high" which is frustrating because while provided evidence might not be so bad, the player is just making the experience worst for everyone.

 

[peoples]

shiiiiit man

we are all saying it's a rule and whatnot but the hardest part of banning for something as vague as toxicity is that we have to provide "enough" proof. i never carry a lot of evidence for one specific person and mainly it just feels like witch hunting looking for those "slip ups", LE and some confident AT's get to do this without much questioning (LE has access to proof and AT's are well trusted enough as a group).

we have the power to do it, but what's the point of placing this ban if it's just going to be reverted in 48 hours because "this evidence is insufficient/not really that toxic/doesn't break rules/doesn't technically break enough rules for this ban to be this high" which is frustrating because while provided evidence might not be so bad, the player is just making the experience worst for everyone.

Here’s the thing, a lot of bans, especially in jail break, are up to admin discretion. It’s up the to banning admin to provide sufficient evidence for the reason they banned someone. So if it’s something like a MFK, it’s a simple as some logs and maybe a video, however for something like “toxicity” It can be a few clips of them intentionally shooting someone that’s barley swaying away from the wardens line (and clearly has no intent to rebel), or a continuous amount of toxic commands given (assuming their warden). Pretty much anything along those lines can be shadowplayed and uploaded within a matter of a few minutes. Also, a detailed summary of what happened, and saying what other admins were on while this occurred will usually be sufficient evidence by itself.

 

[WaSe]

then why don't any admins use that power?

I'm sorry, are you trying to imply that I'm not happy to ban people?

 

[Architect of Life]

But lowering the toxicity will make the toxic people even more toxic