Classic Literature

cantholdmymud

New Poster
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
0
I'm personally very fond of classic literature, I keep myself busy reading books from famous world war figures such as Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Lenin.. etc My personal favorite of all times has to be "Mein Kampf" by Adolf Hitler, its a book that really hit me. Its about 700 pages long and its a hard to get into Hitlers mind, he has allot of criticism on several cultures. I do agree on most of his statements.

This is one of my favorite fragments from the book itself:

The easiest and hence most widespread explanation of the present misfortune is that it was brought about by the consequences of the lost War and that therefore the War is the cause of the present evil.
There may be many who will seriously believe this nonsense but there are still more from whose mouth such an explanation can only be a lie and conscious falsehood. This last applies to all those who today feed at the government's cribs. For didn't the prophets of the revolution again and again point out most urgently to the people that it was a matter of complete indifference to the broad masses how this War turned out? Did they not, on the contrary, gravely assure us that at most the 'big capitalist' could have an interest in a victorious end of the gigantic struggle of nations, but never the German people as such, let alone the German worker? Indeed, didn't these apostles of world conciliation maintain the exact opposite: didn't they say that by a German defeat 'militarism' would be destroyed, but that the German nation would celebrate its most glorious resurrection? Didn't these circles glorify the benevolence of the Entente, and didn't they shove tile blame for the whole bloody struggle on Germany? And could they have done this without declaring that even military defeat would be without special consequences for the nation? Wasn't the whole revolution embroidered with the phrase that it would prevent the victory of the German flag, but that through it the German people would at last begin advancing toward freedom at home and abroad?
Will you claim that this was not so, you wretched, lying scoundrels?
It takes a truly Jewish effrontery to attribute the blame for the collapse solely to the military defeat when the central organ of all traitors to the nation, the Berlin Vorwarts, wrote that this time the German people must not bring its banner home victorious!
And now this is supposed to be the cause of our collapse?
Of course, it would be perfectly futile to fight with such forgetful liars. I wouldn't waste my words on them if unfortunately this nonsense were not parroted by so many thoughtless people, who do not seem inspired by malice or conscious insincerity. Furthermore, these discussions are intended to give our propaganda fighters an instrument which is very much needed at a time when the spoken word is often twisted in our mouths.
 
For me it's definitely Candide: Or, Optimism. Candide is the story of an optimistic young lad and how fate conspires to make his life a living hell. It manages to satirizes everything from religion to entire philosophies.

Candide was struck with amazement, and could not for the soul of him conceive how he came to be a hero. One fine spring morning, he took it into his head to take a walk, and he marched straight forward, conceiving it to be a privilege of the human species, as well as of the brute creation, to make use of their legs how and when they pleased. He had not gone above two leagues when he was overtaken by four other heroes, six feet high, who bound him neck and heels, and carried him to a dungeon. A courtmartial sat upon him, and he was asked which he liked better, to run the gauntlet six and thirty times through the whole regiment, or to have his brains blown out with a dozen musket-balls?

In vain did he remonstrate to them that the human will is free, and that he chose neither; they obliged him to make a choice, and he determined, in virtue of that divine gift called free will, to run the gauntlet six and thirty times.

He had gone through his discipline twice, and the regiment being composed of 2,000 men, they composed for him exactly 4,000 strokes, which laid bare all his muscles and nerves from the nape of his neck to his stern. As they were preparing to make him set out the third time our young hero, unable to support it any longer, begged as a favor that they would be so obliging as to shoot him through the head; the favor being granted, a bandage was tied over his eyes, and he was made to kneel down.

P.S. Sorry for the wall of text.
 
I have never understood why people apologise for posting at length. I for one prefer it to a bundle of meaningless one-liners.

As for classic literature, I'm not sure if Calvino counts as classic but if so... his If on a winter's night a traveler is truly sublime; every other chapter is in the second-person, and the others are all the first halves of many short stories. It certainly makes for an interesting read.

You are about to begin reading Italo Calvino's new novel, If on a winter's night a traveler. Relax. Concentrate. Dispel every other thought. Let the world around you fade. Best to close the door; the TV is always on in the next room. Tell the others right away, "No, I don't want to watch TV!" Raise your voice--they won't hear you otherwise--"I'm reading! I don't want to be disturbed!" Maybe they haven't heard you, with all that racket; speak louder, yell; "I'm beginning to read Italo Calvino's new novel!" Or if you prefer, don't say anything; just hope they'll leave you alone.

Find the most comfortable position: seated, stretched out, curled up, or lying flat. Flat on your back, on your side, on your stomach. In an easy chair, on the sofa, in the rocker, the deck chair, on the hassock. In the hammock, if you have a hammock. On top of your bed, of course, or in the bed. You can even stand on your hands, head down, in the yoga position. With the book upside down, naturally.

Of course, the ideal position for reading is something you can never find. In the old days they used to read standing up, at a lectern. People were accustomed to standing on their feet, without moving. They rested like that when they were tired of horseback riding. Nobody ever thought of reading on horseback; and yet now, the idea of sitting in the saddle, the book propped against the horse's mane, or maybe tied to the horse's ear with a special harness, seems attractive to you. With your feet in the stirrups, you should feel quite comfortable for reading; having your feet up is the first condition for enjoying a read.

Well, what are you waiting for? Stretch your legs, go ahead and put yuour feet on a cushion, or two cushions, on the arms of the sofa, on the wings of the chair, on the coffee table, on the desk, on the piano, on the globe. Take your shoes off first. If you want to, put your feet up; if not, put them back. Now don't stand there with your shoes in one hand and the book in the other.

Adjust the light so you won't strain your eyes. Do it now, because once you're absorbed in reading there will be no budging you. Make sure the page isn't in shadow, a clotting of black letters on a gray background, uniform as a pack of mice; but be careful that the light cast on it isn't too strong, doesn't glare on the cruel white of the paper gnawing at the shadows of the letters as in a southern noonday. Try to foresee now everything that might make you interrupt your reading. Cigarettes within reach, if you smoke, and the ashtray. Anything else? Do you have to pee? All right, you know best.

It's not that you expect anything in particular from this particular book. You're the sort of person who, on principle, no longer expects anything of anything. There are plenty, younger than you or less young, who live in the expectation of extraordinary experiences: from books, from people, from journeys, from events, from what tomorrow has in store. But not you. You know that the best you can expect is to avoid the worst. This is the conclusion you have reached, in your personal life and also in general matters, even international affairs. What about books? Well, precisely because you have denied it in every other field, you believe you may still grant yourself legitimately this youthful pleasure of expectation in a carefully circumscribed area like the field of books, where you can be lucky or unlucky, but the risk of disappointment isn't serious.
 
I was typing up a response when my electricity went out, it was to be the first reply and i am surprised this thread is still around. I have classical literature, i love it, but i will not post it in a thread that lumps Cervantes and Dostoevsky with Hitler. Don't get me wrong, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, though i would consider Mao superior to Hitler, and others have a place. However, under no criteria is such place in classic literature, never. To say that Hitler's Mein Kampf is to the level or Camus's L'homme en Revolt or Dostoevsky's Notes form the underground is quite a reflection on yourself and what you are trying to do here.

I find it rather interesting that the first post you make is a passage form Hitler. I will put up a Zen story.


82. Nothing Exists

YAMAOKA TESSHU, as a young student of Zen, visited one master after another.He called upon Dokuon of Shokoku.

Desiring to show his attainment, he said: "The mind, Buddha, and sentient beings, after all, do not exist. The true nature of phenomena is emptiness. There is no realization, no delusion, no sage, no mediocrity. There is no giving and nothing to be received."

Dokuon, who was smoking quietly, said nothing. Suddenly he whacked Yamaoka with his bamboo pipe. This made the youth quite angry.

"If nothing exists," inquired Dokuon, "where did this anger come from?"
​
 
wow guys how do u get motivated reading can somone explain ive tried to read never succeded
 
Your problem is that you try reading. Remember as a child, did you ever try playing or you played? And do not give reading some great improtance and make it serious. That is what kills it. Children have that amazing sense of wonder, that somehow we lose, i guess because people make thigns serious and important. Read just to read and for no reason other than reading. Once you find that sense of wonder like a child you cannot stop.
 
thanks frank booth well im still a kid not a young kid but getting old almost an adult one more year but sometimes its just the type of books people make some are intersting and some are just whack u know and sometimes i just dont have time i go to work go to school family time and same routine
 
I'm relatively young, teenager at least, and in my years I've read many great, thought provoking novels, koolaid, its not that hard, you just have to get sucked into a book, just read, don't try.

Amongst my favorite classics:
Dracula (Bram Stoker)
Frankenstein (Mary Shelly)
The Autobiography of Malcolm X(Not a Classic, but very important, and good.)
Mein Kampf

I find it hard to belive I've read all these things at my age.... I'm a messed up kid
 

Latest posts

Back
Top