Keep or Ban Distracting Sprays?

[Kill Me]

Should we keep or ban distracting sprays?
---> http://edgegamers.org/forums/showthread.php?t=63347

 

[First Timer]

I say ban.

 

[EliteDragon]

I would say keep since it's your responsibility to differ a real from a fake...but i guess some people have problems with it. I'll have to go with them..

 

[Fuegosan]

I dont care, as long as the sprays are not a naked insurgent or naked marine we are ok to go lol

 

[Frank Booth]

I would not like to give the admins more work, as if the regular sprays are not work enough.

 

[SoulRipper]

Voted against. Seems like a not very important rule to have to enforce.

 

[Lightningcount]

I posted that mainly as a way to let everyone know to not be fooled by it...although it IS pretty hard to tell sometimes. I still pump rounds into ones I see on almaaden. We allow funny stuff like the dude with the helmet on eating the ginormous hamburger (I still laugh every time I see that). So this one should be allowed as well. But in the end, it is not my decision. My opinion is that they should be kept. And honestly it is a very VERY good strategy in war to distract your enemy. We even dropped hundreds of dummy soldiers equipped with firecrackers before d-day to draw troops away from the landing and drop zones.

 

[The Big Herm]

Once again everyone...I dont mean to be rude, but it isnt the e-O's place to make up the rules. Lets leave that to the people in charge.