Amusing Fail
- Thread starter blizbiggy
- Start date
oh you mean extreme racisim?? lol
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2008
- Messages
- 4,322
Darwinism is the belief in "Survival of the fittest." In that animals/people/etc that are to weak, and (this is the key) STUPID to survive die off and the strong/cunning/intelligent animals/people/etc survive and spread said DNA... thats the way it used to be...
not so much anymore. and we get things like that newspaper article...
Darwins book is called The Origin Of Species By Means Of Natural Selection, Or The Preservation Of Favoured Races In The Struggle For Life which seems almost acceptable until you apply it to people. Hitler believed the Arian race was the furthest descendant from ape and jews nearly pure ape. he had a list of it, so obviously in his valiant attempt to speed up the process of evolution, he just killed them. the japanese actually spent loads of money doing scientific research to see which race had the least body hair, and of course it was them.
back during the time when Darwin came out with his theories and book, slavery was rampant throughout the world. it was popular to think that way, even acceptable. but now, today, hopefully for everybody it isn't acceptable...its absurd.
its easy to understand why such PEOPLE as the aborigines were absolutely slaughtered like animals when you apply their mindset as darwin's evolution theory.
and by reading your post again, it seems like you wish whomever wrote that article was not alive today because they do not fit your description of being the fittest, and thus shouldn't survive.
back during the time when Darwin came out with his theories and book, slavery was rampant throughout the world. it was popular to think that way, even acceptable. but now, today, hopefully for everybody it isn't acceptable...its absurd.
its easy to understand why such PEOPLE as the aborigines were absolutely slaughtered like animals when you apply their mindset as darwin's evolution theory.
and by reading your post again, it seems like you wish whomever wrote that article was not alive today because they do not fit your description of being the fittest, and thus shouldn't survive.
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2009
- Messages
- 200
darn cant see pictures on skool computers
First off, Godwin's Law. You lose. :facewall:
Darwinism is NOT "extreme racism" by any means. As Rellik stated, it is all about survival of the most capable of a species in order to reproduce and (by logic) pass on "superior" genes to their offspring. From a scientific standpoint, it makes perfect sense. From a "humanitarian" aspect, it's questionable. But what isn't in this day and age?
You need to understand the history behind events in order to properly judge them, in particular your comment about Hitler and "speeding up evolution." To the German public in the early 1930s, he had a brilliant idea that made sense at the time. Not that I'm defending it, by any means, but I'm simply stating the obvious. I've studied German for five years; it's not like I'm simply rephrasing Wikipedia. The idea was not to "speed up evolution"; that doesn't simply happen. True evolution occurs over a long period of time, not the single generation at the time of World War II.
I've considered these topics a great deal, and I do in fact believe that "survival of the fittest" happens; the overwhelming evidence of evolution validates this. There's a reason why the "Darwin Awards" were created, after all.
well i've studied specifically evolution and the so called "evidence" and creation and its evidences for around the same time you've studied German.
i've also learned that debating it is completely pointless because evolutionists are the most closed minded people i've ever known to exist. so keep believing what they want you to believe, but if you really want truth, search it out...you'll find it
i've also learned that debating it is completely pointless because evolutionists are the most closed minded people i've ever known to exist. so keep believing what they want you to believe, but if you really want truth, search it out...you'll find it
I've found it. Something inside me wants to go with the idea called "intelligent design," but that can't be proven. I'm an engineer (and thus, like hard data to look at.) Everything points to evolution to me, and while I'm no biologist, the inherent similarities between many species over a long time horizon are fairly solid evidence in the theory. Nothing just "happens" because it can; Darwin had it right. I knew a person in high school who wrote a paper (making complete sense!) claiming that dog leashes were hindering natural selection.
As you said, antievolutionists are the "most closed minded people" in the world when it comes to debating the obvious. I've always been open to new theories, but not those forced upon people. As my statistics professor humorously commented, "In God we trust; all others please provide data!"
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2008
- Messages
- 1,813
LOL
what newspaper was that?
what newspaper was that?
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2009
- Messages
- 930
yup yup , have you guys seen the movie Idiocracy? the dumb shall inherit the earth:facewall:
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2009
- Messages
- 930
wha? I'm all for PETA
People for the Edible Treatment of Animals that is.
I'm a meatatarian, its a life choice.
