I do video editing and video photo journalism and i would say the canon is the way to go, sony tends to be more closed, the sony cameras record and play at different speeds then most cameras and usually require you to buy there products to use your camera, if you want to take photos on the camera you will need to get sonys brand of a SD card. Also certain dv tapes will not work in sonys. If i were you i would get a hard drive camera, the tape mechanisms on the minidv cameras tend to be fragile and break easily and once there broken it would cost $100-$300 to repair. I have both a sony PD-170 and and a Canon DM-XL2 and i like the canon better because with the sony if i record anything on it, i wont be able to play it on any other camera and i wont be able play any other cameras video on the sony because o the different head speeds. The tape mechanism on my sony pd-170 broke once in its 4 year life span and it cost $157 to repair, granted the camera cost $1700 so it was worth the repair, but the tape mechanism is the same in a $200 camera and a $1700 camera so it may not be worth it for you if yours breaks. I use mostly minidv and i do get what your saying about tapes, but a soon as the two of my minidv cameras break i will be getting a hard drive. Hope this helps. So i would say get the Canon if your hardbent on getting a minidv camera.