- Joined
- Jan 31, 2008
- Messages
- 5,768
At least anyone above the ranks =(e)= is not being rude. That would be worst. Think of it this way. There are good =(e)= 's and bad =(e)='s. Good =(e)='s represent gold nuggets. Bad =(e)= 's represent common dirt. =(eG)= 's and =(eGO)= 's are the strainers. There's going to be more dirt than gold. =(eG)='s and =(eGO)='s filter the dirt in search of gold. Yes it's tiring and dirty looking for gold, but it's worth it in the end. I don't support rude =(e)= behavior but, it's better for them to show there true color's while there an =(e)= instead of an =(eG)=. It lets us know who will be a good =(eG)= instead of a poor =(eG)=.
no that is a nice way to put it like it.











