Battlefield, Bad Company 2

[shadowwraith]

Just wanted to mention and give you guys the low down, just purchased the Battlefield Bad Company 2

anyone not sure about it..... I just wanted to say awesome game, graphics and game play...still the beta version so a couple of weeks yet.

the low down so far is unlike other multi player games you've got clear objectives and none of the running around and around the map collecting up kills.

and the winning team advances not only in rank and weapons but pushes the other team off the map on to a different section to hold or take depending on your point of view. until the entire match is won and it has a end game/match movie sequence ;-)

You've got vehicles and the means to take them out... now the weapons are set in groups and task so you have got to decide what you role is going to be as that will affect the weapon you have to use ..such as medic or a assault role.

and most importantly we got server support ;-)

so I've got my tag on already i don't know all the ins and outs of the game yet but with what i have seen so far it's well worth purchasing.

anyhow thats me..... catch you all later

Shadow

 

[GBear]

Sounds cool! I think I'll go purchase it soon enough. I just hope my computer can run it. :/ On highest graphics of course.

 

[GameGuy]

yeah i wanna put a preorder down soon... im a tad nervous about the specs, but i think my computer will be able to squeak by.

 

[that_guy]

im running it on my old rig it has a HD4850 a q6600 quad at 2.44Ghz and 4 gigs of ram on 1900x1200 resolution with a steady70-90 FPS

If I had a dual core it would be around 40-50 FPS considering the game uses all 4 cores.

Most I spent on this rig was 150-200$ worth of upgrades to a stock PC

Basicly if you have a quad core processor your fine.

 

[Cut Chem!st]

im running it on my old rig it has a HD4850 a q6600 quad at 2.44Ghz and 4 gigs of ram on 1900x1200 resolution with a steady70-90 FPS

If I had a dual core it would be around 40-50 FPS considering the game uses all 4 cores.

Most I spent on this rig was 150-200$ worth of upgrades to a stock PC

Basicly if you have a quad core processor your fine.

I doubt that. Maybe in a lower player count server, but not in a full game. My specs get 50 average and they are almost double yours. I haven't heard of anyone getting more than 60+ fps average.

 

[Altec]

I've played the BETA version and I like what I see. I really love the destructible houses and I even love more that you can run over trees with tanks. The infantry combat in the game could use work, but I understand that it's more team oriented then running around like Rambo.

My main goal is to learn to fly that darn BlackHawk helicopter!

 

[that_guy]

Hehe I play Euro Servers with like 3v3/4v4

 

[GaibanKnite]

Sounds like tf2 with vehicles.

 

[BobWango]

i got a dual core 3.0ghz and 4 gigs of ram, 8800gt vid card and i run the game no problem. esp in a full 32slot server

 

[GBear]

i got a dual core 3.0ghz and 4 gigs of ram, 8800gt vid card and i run the game no problem. esp in a full 32slot server

Hm okay good. Good to hear this game utilizes 4 cores.

I've got a Q6600 @ 3.15GHz, 2 GB of Mushkin 5-5-5-15 at 900MHz, OC'd eVGA 8800. Think I can run it?

 

[Blindy]

Bad Company 2 is an amazing game. The graphics and game play are terrific and lovely. You're always on the move and even though we play the same map over and over again, it never gets old. I like sitting on top of the hills and sniping people running around, lol. I can't wait for the full game to be released, and I'm also excited for two things. The single player and eGO having our own servers, can't wait!

 

[doofus]

Sounds like tf2 with vehicles.

totally is not at all like TF2...well maybe is similar in the fact that there are player classes.

TF2 is more like Battlefield Heroes than anything else...

 

[doofus]

I doubt that. Maybe in a lower player count server, but not in a full game. My specs get 50 average and they are almost double yours. I haven't heard of anyone getting more than 60+ fps average.

I was about to say the same thing.

I don't get anything more than 50 on average and i have an i7 920 (stock 2.6ghz) and 285gtx and 12gb of ram.

I run the game at 1680x1050 on all max settings no AA and sometimes at the beginning of a round it will drop pretty low.

I have another computer though and it has an older 3.0ghz Pentium D with an 8800gts and 4gb of ram and it runs pretty weak (avg maybe 20fps) at 1280x1024, everything on low.

 

[yellowbadger52]

Hm okay good. Good to hear this game utilizes 4 cores.

I've got a Q6600 @ 3.15GHz, 2 GB of Mushkin 5-5-5-15 at 900MHz, OC'd eVGA 8800. Think I can run it?

you probably could run it fine. Maybe not maxed out but it would be playable.

I dont know what my fps in it but it seems to run quite well. I have it set to all max setting with no AA/AF and it seems to run quite smooth.

I have a phenom II 925 @ 3.3ghz 4gb ddr3 1333 and a radeon 4870.

 

[Saeten]

I doubt that. Maybe in a lower player count server, but not in a full game. My specs get 50 average and they are almost double yours. I haven't heard of anyone getting more than 60+ fps average.

Same. 32 man maxed out w/ HBAO i get around 55 and the lowest i saw was a 42.

 

[Bonefrag]

I pre-ordered this and I'm totally psyched - can't wait to play it!

 

[FluffyTDestroyer]

BFBC2 thread: http://www.edgegamers.org/forums/showthread.php?t=115829

(583 replies in a little over a month... such slackers.)