My dad got me a new laptop for graduation (which is absolutely beyond a massive upgrade off my desktop PC, which only just made it up to 2gigs of RAM and was bottlenecked with only AGP slots for graphics cards and an incredibly outdated processor), and so far it's running everything great. TF2 had everything turned up but anti-aliasing by default and was running smooth, didn't get a chance to actually check the FPS before I had to drop off. I had to slightly drop the graphics on MW2 to keep up an FPS level that wouldn't hinder playability.
The problem is that I don't know how well BC2 will run. I've gotten mixed opinions on whether or not it's easier to run than MW2, but I'd figure it'd take a more power to handle the excessive particle effects?
From what I've gathered from Aida32 (sadly, there wasn't a specs list on the box or inside it):
-Intel Dual Core, each @ 1.30 GHz, 1733 MHz
-GeForce G210M (I'm not up on laptop graphics, I have no idea what range that's in)
-4 gigs of RAM (can't find where the type is listed in Aida32 but it tops the benchmark list.)
Strangely a lot of things are being listed as "unknown" in Aida32, including my motherboard info.
The problem is that I don't know how well BC2 will run. I've gotten mixed opinions on whether or not it's easier to run than MW2, but I'd figure it'd take a more power to handle the excessive particle effects?
From what I've gathered from Aida32 (sadly, there wasn't a specs list on the box or inside it):
-Intel Dual Core, each @ 1.30 GHz, 1733 MHz
-GeForce G210M (I'm not up on laptop graphics, I have no idea what range that's in)
-4 gigs of RAM (can't find where the type is listed in Aida32 but it tops the benchmark list.)
Strangely a lot of things are being listed as "unknown" in Aida32, including my motherboard info.
















