Fart's Fine Art Thread

Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 by Marcel Duchamp

duchamp-nude-descending-a-staircase.jpg


Full size: http://www.uncg.edu/rom/courses/dafein/civ/nude_no2.jpg

"an explosion in a shingle factory" is how the critics at the time described it.

This is a modernist classic, but at the time Duchamp received tons of criticism for it. Parodies, Cartoons, and Art Critics all made fun of his art. However, it proved to be a beautiful and really influential painting. Its revolutionary. Look at the differences between this art and the other things I have posted. Great stuff.
 
That blew my mind. I am somewhat partial to the Last Judgement part of the Sistine Chapel, since it exposes the genius of Da Vinci in The Last Supper. Also, the Last Judgement is ironic, since it shows Bartholomew holding a flayed skin, although Bartholomew himself was flayed. Also, the face on the skin is identified as Michaelangelo, the painter. Its some pretty cool stuff.
 
That blew my mind. I am somewhat partial to the Last Judgement part of the Sistine Chapel, since it exposes the genius of Da Vinci in The Last Supper. Also, the Last Judgement is ironic, since it shows Bartholomew holding a flayed skin, although Bartholomew himself was flayed. Also, the face on the skin is identified as Michaelangelo, the painter. Its some pretty cool stuff.

I love the image of Charon the ferryman. That idea has been around for hundreds of years. Yeah, Bartholomew's skin is awesome. This viewer is pretty neat-o
 
salmon_07.jpg


Hyperrealism!
Full article here: http://illusion.scene360.com/sculptures/7070/jamie-salmon/

This, believe it or not, is a statue. A crazy, crazy statue. This represents "Modern Art" as we know it. Imagine life as an artist before the invention of the photograph. Your job is to portray reality as best you can. Then, this thing comes out that captures reality PERFECTLY (arguable, but for this thread its a fine contention). Thats why people see modern art and go "WTF is this blocks and stuff?" Its because the photograph changed everything. These statues are not the first of their kind. They represent basically the photograph of the Statue art world. Cool stuff
 
Last edited:
I myself don't like to delve into any type of modernist or hypermodernist art, and prefer classics. I would like to do a Botticelli piece, however, the one that I am thinking of has nudity, and keeping with the eGO nature, I won't post one of those in these forums, regardless of how artful it is.
 
250px-Zuccone_Donatello_OPA_Florence.jpg


Full size: http://www.insecula.com/PhotosNew/00/00/08/28/ME0000082809_3.JPG

Prophet Habacuc by Donatello

Donatello was one of the first sculptors to incorporate perspectival illusionism. Perspectival illusionism is usually associated with a single technique developed during the Italian Renaissance for the construction of architectural space on a two-dimensional surface. Thats a bunch of mumbo-jumbo that is not important.

The point is this marks a very important time in the Renaissance. The statues are starting to regain the life-life qualities they had in the roman times. The styles of the artists match the mindsets of the classical awakening. Fun stuff.
 
Well, at the "urging" of Fart, I have decided to go against my earlier post. So now, I present to you, Botticelli's Birth of Venus.
800px-Birth_of_Venus_Botticelli.jpg

Full image here.

This painting shows the "birth" of the Roman goddess Venus (Identified with Aphrodite in Greek mythology). Venus is the goddess of love and beauty, so in my opinion, the generous use of flowers is very appropriate. There is a curious lack of shadows, obviously Botticelli wanted to make the goddess not entirely human. The sea shell in classical senses, is a metaphor for feminine beauty, so it is only appropriate that the goddess of beauty arises from the sea on a symbol of beauty.
 
nice piece artinz

this thread is great

im with artinz on the modern and hypermodern art

i dont understand how putting a single blue dot in the middle of a canvas, or just painting the entire canvas in one color could ever be considered art

art is supposed to be about expressing yourself in different ways when words wont work
 
Red sunset on the Dnieper, Arkhip Ivanovich Kuindzhi, 1905-8

Here's a small, low res version I found. It's a wonder to see in person. It's mostly empty space, but what's there is filled with detail.

DT2557.jpg


I've always been partial toward landscapes. I've been known to stop playing games to admire the scenery. Unfortunately, aside from very specific moments in the campaigns of a few games, there isn't much to see anymore.

Anyway, this page will let you zoom in on parts to get some high levels of detail.

Link to Met museum's page on the work.

Particularly intriguing is the relation between the cloud formation in this image and that of the atomic bomb, yet Kuindzhi died in 1943. It's only a few tweaks away. I made a cheap shoop of what it could look like (mostly stamps and transformations), but I don't think I can find that.

EDIT: I don't get colorfields, either. Perhaps it will click one day, like it did for Picaso. Strangely enough, Picaso clicked while I was reading a page on anger management strategies (one of my many spend-three-hours-clicking-links-on-wikipedia marathons. I think I started on a news article about the lost Egyptian airliner black box that day).
 
Last edited:
Nice post Dodo! I like it.
Speaking of landscapes, here is some semi-impressionist semi-landscapes by JMW Turner.
Joseph-Mallord-William-Turner-xx-Slave-Ship-Slavers-Throwing-Overboard-the-Dead-and-Dying-Typhoon-Coming-On-1840.jpg


Full size: http://www.grahamdragon.co.uk/tursla.jpg

The painting is called Slave Ship (Slavers Throwing Overboard the Dead and Dying, Typhoon Coming On). JMW Turner read a story about a slave owned who was losing a high than normal amount of slaves on his voyage across the ocean. So, in order to assure he made a profit, he threw all the slaves at sea so he could mark them as "Lost at Sea" and receive insurance for them.

At first glance this is a pretty painting (I suggest going into full size for this picture). But then look at the lower righthand corner. You can see various limbs thrashing in the water as they are being eaten by sharks. Then you realize the water isn't red because its supposed to be pretty, but because its the blood of the slaves. All in all, a pretty powerful picture. And beautiful. Tomorrow, another Bruegel.
 
brueghel_icarus.jpg

Landscape with the Fall of Icarus

Full size (Recommended): http://www.jonathanrosenbaum.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/icarus.jpg

This is a great painting that, like most of the things in here, has more than meets the eye. At first glance, it is just a rather pretty idyllic harbor.

But look in the water in the right hand corner. There we see Icarus, who has fallen because he flew too close to the sun*. We see the different levels of people, the lowest peasant both sees and hear Icarus fall, the second only hears it, and the third and highest doesn't even know it happened. This is a very interesting statement about the nature of people, dont you think?

* For the full Icarus myth, click this link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icarus
 

This is a great painting that, like most of the things in here, has more than meets the eye. At first glance, it is just a rather pretty idyllic harbor.

But look in the water in the right hand corner. There we see Icarus, who has fallen because he flew too close to the sun*. We see the different levels of people, the lowest peasant both sees and hear Icarus fall, the second only hears it, and the third and highest doesn't even know it happened. This is a very interesting statement about the nature of people, dont you think?

* For the full Icarus myth, click this link
[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icarus"]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icarus[/URL][/quote]




I just wanted to add something to this: There's an interesting poem by W.H. Audin that uses this painting as an example. Since I'm aware that Audin is not common reading material these days, I'll just include it below.

[I]Musee des Beaux Arts[/I]


[I]About suffering they were never wrong,
The Old Masters; how well, they understood
Its human position; how it takes place
While someone else is eating or opening a window or just walking dully along;
How, when the aged are reverently, passionately waiting
For the miraculous birth, there always must be
Children who did not specially want it to happen, skating
On a pond at the edge of the wood:
They never forgot
That even the dreadful martyrdom must run its course
Anyhow in a corner, some untidy spot
Where the dogs go on with their doggy life and the torturer's horse
Scratches its innocent behind on a tree.
[B]In Breughel's Icarus, for instance: how everything turns away
Quite leisurely from the disaster; the ploughman may
Have heard the splash, the forsaken cry,
But for him it was not an important failure; the sun shone
As it had to on the white legs disappearing into the green
Water; and the expensive delicate ship that must have seen
Something amazing, a boy falling out of the sky,
had somewhere to get to and sailed calmly on. [/B][/I]


Just like the painting has more to it than meets the eye, the poem does too. However, I'm not a poet, I'm a historian, so I'll leave the analysis there for those who actually care to do it.
 
Last edited:
Robert-Rauschenberg-Retroactive-I--Kennedy--162975.jpg


Full size (Once again recommended): http://rickyday.net/blog/retroactive_i_1964.jpg


This is Retroactive I by Robert Rauschenberg. This painting really shows his interest in American icons and Abstract Expressionism. He took different press photographs and colored them, and painted (sometimes with a piece of tire dipped in ink) on them. The interesting placement of the astronaut and Kennedy makes for a clear view on American iconography.

His style is sometimes called Neo-Dada


"I don?t want a picture to look like something it isn?t. I want it to look like something it is. And I think a picture is more like the real world when it?s made out of the real world.? -Robert Rauschenberg

Speaking of Dada, we will have Dada tomorrow!
 
Freights

I don't know if you guys are interested in graffiti. Most people dis-like graffiti and say its not art.
I personally love graffiti Mostly on freights (trains).
I love trains also not just the graffiti.


Some graffiti artist have respect for the workers for freights.
So some times artist don't go over the ID number on each freight so the workers could see them which i think is awesome. Some artist even pick their cans up and throw them away instead of leaving them there on the floor.


I'm really into freights as you can see lol. I can look at freights all day. I won't say if i do do graffiti or not.
But i think more people should respect the art form.
If you guys don't like to see photos of graffiti just say it I'll under stand :D


Here's some photos.
Sorry about the first picture i couldn't make it smaller.

3173478498_b9c4c25ea2_b.jpg

the names are FART • BARF • P.ONE • FUEGO
4442058421_ecd221c286_z.jpg

This one says SWEAR
4685656214_33ab5d6314_z.jpg


These guys are from Canada
This one is done by craver and keep6 craver did the character of stevie wonder,
craver is one of my favorite artist on characters.
keep6 is really good.

These are just some of freights.
 
Nice post Gunbowzer! Ill post some of my favorite grafitti later! Good idea!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top