Any1 using AMD Phenom quads w/ DoD:S?

-=KA=- Colonel

Active Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
402
I'm looking to get a new rig since I'm still on my 3.0Ghz Pentium D and it has never played DoD:S well....like only 30-45fps :(

Anyhow, so far I've found these two rigs, one has the new'ish AMD quad core chip and the other has the Intel quad....both are overclocked.

So I'm wondering if anyone has the Phenom chip with an 8800GT or 8800GTS video card, and how many fps you are getting. I'm shooting for 100fps.

Rig 1.....AMD:

CPU: AMD Phenom™ Quad-Core 9600 BE AM2+ 2.3GHz, 4Mb Cache (overclocked to 2.8Ghz)
CPU Cooler: Zalman CNPS9500 AM2 Ultra Quiet CPU Cooler (Black)
Overclocking: ETC Computer Professional OC Service (2.3GHz to 2.8GHz)
Dual Channel Memory: Crucial Ballistix Tracer DDR2-1066 2GB Kit (1GB X2) (with LEDs)
Motherboard: Asus M3A (AM2+,AMD 770,4DDR2-1066,GbLan)
Hard Drive 1: Western Digital 320GB 7200RPM 8MB SATA II
Optical Drive 1: LITE-ON LH-20A1L 20X Dual Layer DVD+/-RW SATA w/LightScribe
SLI Video Card: EVGA Nvidia GeForce 8800GT Superclocked 512MB
Audio: Onboard 8 Channel High Definition Audio
Network Card: Onboard Gigabyte Network Card
Case: Coolermaster CM 690 Mid Tower Black ATX Case
Power Supply: OCZ GameXStream 600W SLI™-Ready/Active PFC Power Supply


Rig 2.....Intel:

CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Conroe Q6600 2.4GHz FSB 1066, 8MB CPU
Over Clocking Overclocked to: Core 2 Quad 3.2GHz*
CPU Cooling: ASUS Arctic Square CPU Cooling Fan
Memory: 4GB DDR II 667 Memory 240 Pin (Kingston)
Motherboard: ASUS P5K Motherboard
Hard Drive 1: Western Digital 320GB 7200RPM 16MB Cache Serial ATA II
Optical Drive: LG 20X DVD RW + Dual Layer SATA w/ Lightscribe Technology
Video: nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS PCI E, 512MB, G92 Dual DVI, TV-Out
Audio: Realtek ALC883 6-channel 3D Audio
Network Card: 10/100/1000 Gigabit Lan Network Card
Ports: 6 USB 2.0 Ports, 1 Parallel, 1394a
Neon Light 2 Sunbeam Cold Cathod Neon Light (blue)
Case: Raidmax Smilodon Gaming Case
Power Supply: 650W Cooler Master Extreme Power SLI RP650PCAR

In case it matters, I intend to run Vista Home Premium. My pal Cole is running a similar Intel setup and is constantly getting around 100-100+fps.

All comments appreciated :)

Best regards,
Colonel
 
Here's my setup Colonel;

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 Kentsfield 2.4GHz (Overclocked to 2.988GHz)
EVGA GeForce 8800GTS (G92) 512MB
EVGA NVIDIA nForce 680i SLI Intel Motherboard
CORSAIR XMS2 4GB(2 x 2GB) DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) (Overclocked)
Thermaltake Aguila Case
Thermaltake 650W modular Powersupply
ZALMAN CNPS9700 LED 110mm 2 Ball CPU Cooler
Window XP Professional

I heard good things about the AMD Phenom. You can go wrong with either setup. I'm running XP right now, I'm hearing some negative things regarding Vista and some of the newer games.

XP won't recognize all 4GB of RAM :( (one advantage of Vista over XP)

Here's some links:

[link=hyperlink url]http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/12/19/amd_phenom_athlon_64_x2/[/link]

[link=hyperlink url]http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/11/08/dual_vs_quad/[/link]


Regularly upwards of 100fps+ (although flash I get around 70-80fps for some reason)

COLE505SantosB.jpg
 
Actually that is not really an accurate considering the server was empty or nearly empty when I took it on the Kettle server.

However, I do get around 100-110fps normally.
 
i roll hard with my 30 fps average

im planning on getting me new rig sometime this yr i might seek you guys guidance for this
 
[quote1204053579=Everlast]
omg, I would kill for 170 fps......
[/quote1204053579]

170 is absolutely no better than 85. Your FPS shouldn't really be higher than your refresh rate which most are between 60-85. Any FPS above your refresh rate is a waste and I haven't seen it but I've heard it can actually distort your picture some.
 
i would go for the 9600gt instead of the 8800 the 9600gt you can get at best buy for 230 its alot cheaper and alot better i went from a 7900gs oc to a 9600gt oc and i get about 2 to three times for fps in all the games on high setting

my setup is
intel core 2 duo e6600
2 gigs of ram
250 gig interal hd
500 gig external hd
nvidia 9600gt oc
create x-fi xtrememusic

you can get all that for cheap now and you will have a amazing build and be able to play any game on high settings
 
[quote1204066391=MilkBoy]
[quote1204053579=Everlast]
omg, I would kill for 170 fps......
[/quote1204053579]

170 is absolutely no better than 85. Your FPS shouldn't really be higher than your refresh rate which most are between 60-85. Any FPS above your refresh rate is a waste and I haven't seen it but I've heard it can actually distort your picture some.

[/quote1204066391]

True...if the refresh of your monitor is set at 75Hz, your monitor/Graphics card simply wont display the extra frames (especially with vertical synch adjusted as such).

However, I can think of several instances when your frame rate can be dragged down, whether it's the server config, location, number of players and/or the particular map you're playing. It's these instances where it pays to have a graphics card that can generate high frames.
 
comin from a guy that was 40 for 30 last night on hobo......whateva~~!!!!

cheers Niko.....I'm kinda shootin for overkill just so I can push off a new rig for another year or two.
 
The GeForce 8800GTS 320MB XXX Edition can push out more frames then the 9600GT 512MB, but it all depends I suppose on what you're really planning on using the computer for. The more cost efficient Graphics card is the 9600GT but if you're going for power I'd rather spend the cash for an 8800GT 512MB (Somehow it out performs the 8800GTX but it doesn't at the same time, sadly NVidia is making less and less sense) the 9600GT only uses 95 Watts of power amazing I know and for around $180 and for about an extra $20 I guess you could get the more efficient GeForce 8800GT 512MB
 
Well I decided to buy the below rig today....can't wait for it to arrive and enjoy the 100fps goodness.........it's been a loooong wait!

I'm sticking with XP Pro since i have alot of software that I still want to use and I wasn't sure if it would run on Vista.

CPU Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4Ghz...overclocked to 3.4GHz
CPU Cooling ASUS Arctic Square CPU Fan
Memory 4GB DDR II 800 nVidia SLI RAM (2GB x 2)
ASUS P5K Motherboard
Hard Drive 1 Western Digital 250GB 7200RPM 16MB Cache Serial ATA II
Optical Drive 1 LG 20X DVD RW +- Dual Layer
nVidia Chaintech 8800 GT 512MB DDR3, HDTV & Dual DVI
Audio Onboard Audio
Onboard Network Card
Raidmax Smilodon Xtreme Black Case
550 Watt Optimax Dual Fan Power Supply
Microsoft Windows XP Professional Edition(OEM)
 
I average about 35-40... WITH a 8800gts.

[quote1204270562=MilkBoy]
[quote1204053579=Everlast]
omg, I would kill for 170 fps......
[/quote1204053579]

170 is absolutely no better than 85. Your FPS shouldn't really be higher than your refresh rate which most are between 60-85. Any FPS above your refresh rate is a waste and I haven't seen it but I've heard it can actually distort your picture some.

[/quote1204270562]
 
wish it was arriving before tmr's scrim arghhhhh

thanks for the help though man, and the rest of you!
 
[quote1204352941=-=KA=- Colonel]
wtf?? what processor chip are you running?
[/quote1204352941]


3800 X2.

When I had my 6600gt, my fps was HIGHER than with the 8800gts......... figure that one out.
 
Back
Top