City Maps

Would you play on City Maps more if it were just the Conquest City Maps?


  • Total voters
    55

LilShortstuf

EGO Is My Life!
Joined
Dec 6, 2010
Messages
4,369
If we changed the City Maps server to just Conquest maps would you play on it more or should we leave it the way it is now?

This does not promise future change but I want a general idea of how you feel about the server right now.


Also there might be the possibility of adding more maps if we switched it just conquest but as I said there is no guarantee of change.
 
Last edited:
I would live on the server then, we already have a HC rush server so its only fair to have a city map server that does not switch to rush. The server will do just as well being a HC city maps as people look for such server so that there can be some equal competition in maps like Metro and Demavand. We can add tehran highway and demavand to it as well, would make a rocking server.
 
I like to play some rush, and then a little small conquest. I don't like to switch servers for it, so being able to swing right into a Conq from Rush, is quite good, and keeps me in the server longer.
 
id say keep it the way it is. as thundr said a mix of the different gamemodes is fun (for me). once youve played conquest on 2 maps in a row you might be happy to have something different with rush and i believe that would make me stay longer.

the only thing i would like to see changed is that we add a few more maps to it. last time ive played there we were playing the same 3 maps which is boring imo.
 
I like to play some rush, and then a little small conquest. I don't like to switch servers for it, so being able to swing right into a Conq from Rush, is quite good, and keeps me in the server longer.

This describes my feelings perfectly.
 
I like to play some rush, and then a little small conquest. I don't like to switch servers for it, so being able to swing right into a Conq from Rush, is quite good, and keeps me in the server longer.

I agree also but the only thing wrong with this server is the voting, people always vote for rush and the conquest becomes a rarity, either have a proper voting structure which gives only conquest options for a few rounds and then switches or have a full conquest server. As it stands now, we ONLY play rush on this server. I understand that people vote for rush because its liked more but that does not mean that we just forget conquest, we already have a HC rush sever to accommodate for the people who like rush, its only fair that the conquest people also get something.
 
I agree also but the only thing wrong with this server is the voting, people always vote for rush and the conquest becomes a rarity, either have a proper voting structure which gives only conquest options for a few rounds and then switches or have a full conquest server. As it stands now, we ONLY play rush on this server. I understand that people vote for rush because its liked more but that does not mean that we just forget conquest, we already have a HC rush sever to accommodate for the people who like rush, its only fair that the conquest people also get something.

Killer is right on about the Rush voting it seems that when I'm on this server its like 85% rush not much conquest. Either redo the voting ( if possible) so we can have a good mix of both or change it for conquest.

Originally Posted by ThundrRok
I like to play some rush, and then a little small conquest. I don't like to switch servers for it, so being able to swing right into a Conq from Rush, is quite good, and keeps me in the server longer.

When it works out correctly this is my choice.

I voted to keep the same because I think to voting can be tweeked a bit
 
Last edited:
I also motion towards what Killer spoke of. I love conquest and would play on it more if it was switched to that. I also enjoy a mix of the 2; however the current voting system is 90% rush maps.
 
Yea like i understand why Thundr wants to keep city maps but i am finding my self joining other conquest servers because I want conquest but sometimes i dont want to play B2K so i would rather just play vanilla bf3 conquest
 
Yea like i understand why Thundr wants to keep city maps but i am finding my self joining other conquest servers because I want conquest but sometimes i dont want to play B2K so i would rather just play vanilla bf3 conquest

I concur. I like conquest on B2K, but it is kinda the only conquest eGO server that I can play on and it has only 4 maps. So it would be a breath of fresh air to see simple conquest on the vanilla maps.
 
Yea like i understand why Thundr wants to keep city maps but i am finding my self joining other conquest servers because I want conquest but sometimes i dont want to play B2K so i would rather just play vanilla bf3 conquest

I concur. I like conquest on B2K, but it is kinda the only conquest eGO server that I can play on and it has only 4 maps. So it would be a breath of fresh air to see simple conquest on the vanilla maps.

Both of these ^

I really like B2K and I'm very glad we have it, but after so long of that being our only normal conquest server, I would like either a normal rush or a normal vanilla conquest server. I understand that people like TDM and HC, but you'll never see me on either. (and yes, I know this poll is about the HC city maps, not the TDM server, just thought I'd include it in the discussion)
 
Last edited:
I like playing these maps on conquest mode.

I would kind of rather see them remain hardcore as there are many places to find cover but then again it'd be fun to have H9 and Randy show up so... I dunno.

I'd add caspian border to the B2K server even though it's not B2K, the map fits the style I think.
 
Last edited:
Give all rush options, followed by all conquest options; repeat. 50% all day baby.
 
I'd really like to play on the vanilla conquest maps. Like Operation Firestorm, Kharg Island, and Caspian Border.
 
so frustrating, on this server today and the only rounds the come up are grand bazaar rush, sience crossing rush or metro rush. One conquest map followed by 10 rush maps.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top