Who would like to have a Hardcore CQB server?
- Thread starter druidsd
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- May 26, 2007
- Messages
- 782
I played it a bit on the HC conquest server and it was a lot of fun. Adds a whole new dimension to the closeness of the battles.
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2009
- Messages
- 2,594
No... way.....
It would be terrible in my opinion.. not only are you dying almost as soon as you spawn by the other team, but also dying by team mates as soon as you spawn.
Honestly I think it would get very, very annoying. TKing is common enough in large maps, I can't even imagine CQ.
CQ shouldn't be HQ imo.. at least not with 32 slots.
but I may possibly just be picturing it worse than it actually would be.
--
edit: if we ADDED another CQ server and made it hardcore, now that would be better. But for right now I don't think we should change the 2 CQ servers we have any further until we see how they turn out.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2007
- Messages
- 2,711
Actually HC CQB maps aren't too bad, they probably seem a bit hectic at first but you can get into the flow of it. And depending on how many people can be on the server, sometimes it'll take you a while to find somebody if everyone is constantly moving.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2012
- Messages
- 330
IMO i think that the "normal mode" will allow for more run and gunning around the map kind of "care free". But with hardcore you have to time when you run out, and map out your paths more wisely.
So in conclusion i think HC would bring more tactical aspect to the server, but some might not join as a result of it being HC.
So in conclusion i think HC would bring more tactical aspect to the server, but some might not join as a result of it being HC.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
- Messages
- 3,418
I really feel that making it HC would be detrimental to us in the long run. Honestly, CQ is intense enough on normal. Hell, I've caught myself and a couple of other guys from time to time shooting at our own teammates because they've surprised us and thought they were the enemy.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2012
- Messages
- 361
Yeah I find myself, also, shooting at my own teammates from time to time; they come out of fudging nowhere. I suppose if we only had a 16 or 24 player server it might be kinda cool to feature HC settings, but with 40 players... I don't think it's such a great idea.
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2012
- Messages
- 2
As bad as the spawns are in CQ, HC would just make it 20 times worse.
Keep it normal imo
Keep it normal imo
- Joined
- May 6, 2010
- Messages
- 2,577
after playing it for a few hours straight today i would like the servers to stay normal. why?
1. teamkilling would be just a huge mess. alot of ppl running in front of scopes, m320s, rockets and nades.
2. i think the maps are small enough that enough bullets are flying around your head and you die pretty fast anyways. from what i can imagine having the servers on hc would shorten the lifetime to an annoying little amount (at least imo).
might be wrong with this cause i havent played it on hc yet but my time is limited.
1. teamkilling would be just a huge mess. alot of ppl running in front of scopes, m320s, rockets and nades.
2. i think the maps are small enough that enough bullets are flying around your head and you die pretty fast anyways. from what i can imagine having the servers on hc would shorten the lifetime to an annoying little amount (at least imo).
might be wrong with this cause i havent played it on hc yet but my time is limited.
I agree with Ovr, I would like to see it change to HC but rather see a second server come up
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2010
- Messages
- 732
The last couple days I've been playing 50/50 HC/normal and, like always, I still like HC better even with the maps so small. Especially for gun master(I can't stress this part enough).
- Joined
- May 18, 2012
- Messages
- 5
i only ever play hardcore cant stand normal mode.
yes i say YES! bring on HC CQ
yes i say YES! bring on HC CQ
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2012
- Messages
- 461
Normal for CQB would be better, but please lord, don't put CQ maps on it.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2009
- Messages
- 1,751
a lot off my close quarter playing time i spend on 16/24 or 64 hardcore servers for a few reasons:
16/24 is best tactically while 64 is to cause your teammates are closer to each other.
Add to that the hardcore element like we our discussing here and its a blast.
In close quarters people tend to run and gun, the hardcore element lets players think more before they pre-fire a corner in the end the amount off teamkills i've noticed for exemple on a crowded 64 slot server is not that high.
The reason is the spawn area's when your running in an area controlled by your teammates the enemy will spawn at the other side off the map controlled by them, this causes the following to happen. If you stick close to the majority off your teammates you can fire accross the map to kill the enemy's. there's no need to prefire the area your in cause your back is secure.
Offcorse if you go rambo going away from your teammates accidents will happen more, but there's always a mini map to look on to locate your teammates, so no valid excuses. I mean isn't it idiotic the idea your shooting teammates by accident and then dont have a scratch?
Also you guys all know the metro map and its choke points, if you compare a normal whit a hardcore metro map you'll see less nade/rpg spamming cause off the hardcore element. its likely its gonne be the same in close quarters.
So yes Hardcore!
16/24 is best tactically while 64 is to cause your teammates are closer to each other.
Add to that the hardcore element like we our discussing here and its a blast.
In close quarters people tend to run and gun, the hardcore element lets players think more before they pre-fire a corner in the end the amount off teamkills i've noticed for exemple on a crowded 64 slot server is not that high.
The reason is the spawn area's when your running in an area controlled by your teammates the enemy will spawn at the other side off the map controlled by them, this causes the following to happen. If you stick close to the majority off your teammates you can fire accross the map to kill the enemy's. there's no need to prefire the area your in cause your back is secure.
Offcorse if you go rambo going away from your teammates accidents will happen more, but there's always a mini map to look on to locate your teammates, so no valid excuses. I mean isn't it idiotic the idea your shooting teammates by accident and then dont have a scratch?
Also you guys all know the metro map and its choke points, if you compare a normal whit a hardcore metro map you'll see less nade/rpg spamming cause off the hardcore element. its likely its gonne be the same in close quarters.
So yes Hardcore!
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2011
- Messages
- 3,227
I really dont care about CQ, both modes are fine but yes Hardcore is a bit better. We need to start focusing on filling HC Conquest and B2K again.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2010
- Messages
- 732
I wonder if you would have posted this if there was a LAV in CQ...
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2011
- Messages
- 3,227
Not really, I still dont think CQ is a good dlc mainly because its not BF but a variation of COD to attract that crowd but everyone has their own opinion. CQ is good and the maps are beautiful but im going to wait for the next DLC.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2012
- Messages
- 361
It'll be very difficult to fill a server for about another week.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2011
- Messages
- 3,227
Surfer and me are working on some initiatives to get people into our servers, will be posting up details soon.
- Status
