Leak on BF4 "Mabye" BFBC 3 !

Natrix

I made one post
Joined
May 15, 2009
Messages
14
Bored...?

Might be worth having a listen too!

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAhPWmIpGgE[/ame]


What do you think..? BFBC 3 before BF4?
 
Honestly, with the DLC not even close to being done being released. Would not be excited to hear about BF4. If people think Premium was a means to milk money out of the consumer base can't imagine what they consider a new installment so soon. The only thing that would make it worthwhile is if they actually lived up to the hype of truly destructible environments that Frostbite 2 allegedly promised. I still feel BC2 had more destruction than BF3 and that's honestly the saddest thing about it all. And speaking of BC2 if the next game was BC3 this early I'd be less apprehensive about the "announcement."
 
Like i am excited to see bf4 but at the same time it sucks that EA has started working on it rather then putting ALL their efforts into bf3 expansions
 
Honestly, with the DLC not even close to being done being released. Would not be excited to hear about BF4. If people think Premium was a means to milk money out of the consumer base can't imagine what they consider a new installment so soon. The only thing that would make it worthwhile is if they actually lived up to the hype of truly destructible environments that Frostbite 2 allegedly promised. I still feel BC2 had more destruction than BF3 and that's honestly the saddest thing about it all. And speaking of BC2 if the next game was BC3 this early I'd be less apprehensive about the "announcement."

Agreed! Once all the expansions have been released and we've had the time to play them, I'm hoping they will start working on BF2143.
 
2143 before bf4, nuff said

This.

I don't think we'll see anything about BF4 officially until at least May of 2013.

Really, BC 1 and 2 were just test games to prepare for the actual core game of BF3. 1) To try BF on console and 2) to work out the Frostbite engine, so that if either didnt work out, people would blame the BC series, not core BF, and I kind of hope that BC is done with, unless they have some new tech to try out.

I actually wouldn't mind if they did a sort of rotation where they make a WWII game, then a modern combat game, then a future game, and on and on, so that we always have an updated version of each time period. Ex. 1942 (WWII) > BF2 (Modern) > 2142 (Future) > 1943 (WWII) > BF3 (Modern), with the next game being hopefully 2143, and by the time they'd be ready to make the next after that, it'd be at least 2015 or 2016, so the newest tech would most likely result in an amazing WWII game, and they could start the cycle again.

I love BF3, and I hope they make it last at least until the end of 2013 (with all the expansions), but I hope the next game is not modern era.
 
This.

I don't think we'll see anything about BF4 officially until at least May of 2013.

Really, BC 1 and 2 were just test games to prepare for the actual core game of BF3. 1) To try BF on console and 2) to work out the Frostbite engine, so that if either didnt work out, people would blame the BC series, not core BF, and I kind of hope that BC is done with, unless they have some new tech to try out.

I actually wouldn't mind if they did a sort of rotation where they make a WWII game, then a modern combat game, then a future game, and on and on, so that we always have an updated version of each time period. Ex. 1942 (WWII) > BF2 (Modern) > 2142 (Future) > 1943 (WWII) > BF3 (Modern), with the next game being hopefully 2143, and by the time they'd be ready to make the next after that, it'd be at least 2015 or 2016, so the newest tech would most likely result in an amazing WWII game, and they could start the cycle again.

I love BF3, and I hope they make it last at least until the end of 2013 (with all the expansions), but I hope the next game is not modern era.

Couldn't of said it better myself
 
if they release a new battlefield before the last expansion for bf3, that will piss me off
 
Honestly, with the DLC not even close to being done being released. Would not be excited to hear about BF4. If people think Premium was a means to milk money out of the consumer base can't imagine what they consider a new installment so soon. The only thing that would make it worthwhile is if they actually lived up to the hype of truly destructible environments that Frostbite 2 allegedly promised. I still feel BC2 had more destruction than BF3 and that's honestly the saddest thing about it all. And speaking of BC2 if the next game was BC3 this early I'd be less apprehensive about the "announcement."

If everything were destructible, i think we would need 4x 690's....lol they have it already but we the consumers just cant afford it, so they will wait to milk our utters even more. Small improvements=longer the series=more money...bla bla bla. WHY DONT THEY JUST RELEASE EVERYTHING!!! what a piss off
 
I'm guessing they could or will never do this but it'd be awesome if they allowed community mods like Desert Combat from 1942. Maybe after the last expansion? Idk how it all works but loved user-created maps, guns, et... Either way i do like idea of battlefield being set in WWII again. Just my 2 cents
 
I already read about it, but its probably true in my opinion, but most likely Battlefield Bad Company 3 because they said bf4 wont come out will like another 4 years.
 
hehehe and watch the support for BF3 go down the tubes, sorry folks it is EA up to their old trick again. This is the reason many of us older players refuse to buy into it.
 
Like i am excited to see bf4 but at the same time it sucks that EA has started working on it rather then putting ALL their efforts into bf3 expansions

just a pet peeve of mine, but EA takes no part in the development of battlefield games thats DICE, EA just publishes the game and offers offsite game testing
 

Latest posts

Back
Top