Which server would you rather move up to 32 slots?

[Cyclone]

Yes, this is why I would personally prefer that we switch Foundry to dynamic 32 slots instead of Dustbowl.

I agree. Foundry would seem like a better choice.

 

[CrashRIT]

32 slots is like a spy. You think it's safe and then it stabs u in the back. I always play on 2 fort and ever since it was made 32 slots it bit me preaty hard.

Agreed.

Quality > Quantity.

 

[Gypsy]

Way back in the day, wasn't Dustbowl a 32-slot server? I remember fondly spending several hours a night with a bunch of JLers, invading that server and reveling in the absolute mayhem (after we could get in - there was always a wait). That server was my mainstay.

That said, I'm not on often enough to really have my vote count - the choice should be made by folks that play the servers every day. And if it's not something I enjoy, I'll just wait and see what the next round of changes brings.

 

[Goz]

Ah, but Goz, you miss something in your argument.

Lag is one of the key factors in whether pubs stay or not. If they lag, they leave.

Valid point. Which is why the complaints shouldn't be forgotten.

Dustbowl, because it is almost always full and we can have more members in the server at once.

Remember guys, this can be changed if it turns out to be affecting us in a negative way; it's not permanent

This can be tried as well, but It'd be much better to avoid having a majority of the community be displeased because it was tried especially since it seems only a few people actually want these servers to become dynamic 32 slot servers.

Do you think Dustbowl's gameplay will become a mess with an extra 8 players running around? It's already full of choke points.

Extra 8 players = potential extra 8 demomen on a map that is an enormous choke point

You think that adding any more spam onto an already spammy map wouldn't do anything?

 

[Wronskain]

Well, whichever server wins is one more that I won't be playing on :/

 

[Orange [INACTIVE]]

Upping the number of people playing while forcing regulars off entirely isn't a good trade-off.

 

[HeadHunter]

Neither. 2-fort is bearable with 32 because anyone who plays on a 24/7 2-fort server isn't there to play seriously. The fps drop from the slot uppage is wreaking havoc on my laptop too. Don't take dustbowl away from me

 

[N-Light]

2fort= lagfest with 32 slot D: change it back! and yea dustbowl since its full throughout the night and i never play on it

 

[AndyGuy]

i don't like 32 player maps at all unless its a hale or achievement map

 

[Thor]

Foundry all day erryday.

 

[Thor]

2fort= lagfest with 32 slot D: change it back! and yea dustbowl since its full throughout the night and i never play on it

Apologies for double-post, but wat.
N-Light..
It's not the server's fault that it's lagging. I get no lag whatsoever.

 

[Deathwing]

Problem here is that a lot of people voting never play on dustbowl.

 

[Goz]

2fort= lagfest with 32 slot D: change it back! and yea dustbowl since its full throughout the night and i never play on it

I'm totally fine with 32 slot servers. I don't get a dip in performance.

So it suddenly becomes ok to put dynamic 32 slots on Dustbowl just because one person never plays on it?