A Foundry Server Recommendation

[Avocado[inactive]]

Thanks Avocado for the efforts you're putting in to save our beloved server ! <3

Thanks Ledzo. my goal with the survey is to provide the eGO leaders with statistical data that support Guacamole' claim. And we almost have an adequate sample size to run a legitimate statistical test! We now have 80 responses and we need 97. Keep spreading the word!

 

[Ledzo]

80 isn't enough??

 

[Avocado[inactive]]

80 isn't enough??

Not really. What's cool about population statistics is that we can accurately predict, or "guess", how everyone in eGO feels about this potential change to the Foundry server simply based on the responses from a small proportion of the eGO population. This "guess", however, has a margin of error. The larger the sample size (aka the number of responses to the Foundry survey), the smaller the margin of error, and the more confident we can be in our claim!

Also, we have to account for the butts who decided to vote more than one time.

Thanks for sticky-ing the thread!

 

[shaPOW!]

Not really. What's cool about population statistics is that we can accurately predict, or "guess", how everyone in eGO feels about this potential change to the Foundry server simply based on the responses from a small proportion of the eGO population. This "guess", however, has a margin of error. The larger the sample size (aka the number of responses to the Foundry survey), the smaller the margin of error, and the more confident we can be in our claim!

Also, we have to account for the butts who decided to vote more than one time.

Thanks for sticky-ing the thread!

Wait! You are saying this doesn't track how many times a person voted?

<goes off to write voting bot>

Unless foundry starts getting populated soon this change is inevitable.

 

[Avocado[inactive]]

yeah it's pretty much inevitable at this point. I didn't expect foundry's rank to drop this low. But we still need to talk about server map time limits and a voting system for map selection.

 

[noblenote]

Not really. What's cool about population statistics is that we can accurately predict, or "guess", how everyone in eGO feels about this potential change to the Foundry server simply based on the responses from a small proportion of the eGO population. This "guess", however, has a margin of error. The larger the sample size (aka the number of responses to the Foundry survey), the smaller the margin of error, and the more confident we can be in our claim!

Also, we have to account for the butts who decided to vote more than one time.

Thanks for sticky-ing the thread!

I'm in AP Stats too!!!

 

[Adam]

Where are we at with these?
We're interested to see the data!

 

[Maserati]

Where are we at with these?
We're interested to see the data!

 

[Avocado[inactive]]

Ladies and gentlemen, the data

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1WAIeUPyx_-fiCDK0r3Xve-YQ1xUq8oe-eHCyt4fzHYQ/viewanalytics

 

[shaPOW!]

Ladies and gentlemen, the data

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1WAIeUPyx_-fiCDK0r3Xve-YQ1xUq8oe-eHCyt4fzHYQ/viewanalytics

Who are the 27% of the people that did not vote for foundry? I WANT NAMES!

 

[Ledzo]

Pwocesssssss

 

[Insomnia Princess]

I <3 data.

 

[noblenote]

Ladies and gentlemen, the data

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1WAIeUPyx_-fiCDK0r3Xve-YQ1xUq8oe-eHCyt4fzHYQ/viewanalytics

Foundry and process!!! But no love for well or fastlane

 

[Minty]

Who's hyped? I'm hyped.

 

[Avocado[inactive]]

Who's hyped? I'm hyped.

I'm hyped! Who else is hyped?

 

[Ledzo]

I'm hyperhyped , who's hyped aswell?