Whenever you get sapped for "1:3 Ratio" you should be moved to #1 in Queue

Status
Not open for further replies.

Corrupted

EGO Zealot
Joined
May 29, 2018
Messages
1,713
So sometimes you get swapped from CT to T to maintain a 1:3 ratio, whenever you get swapped you should be 1st in the queue. For example CT X got swapped = #1 in queue, CT Y got swapped = #2 in queue , and so on so forth.
 
Upvote 0
There's lots of interesting discussion when it comes down to moral theory (and this is just glancing the surface), but in short, my stance is that it is immoral (unfair) to force somebody to randomly somebody just so that others can move up in the queue.

Are we actually getting into discussion about moral theory over a single person getting their team changed in a game server?

Holy crap. You guys are getting ridiculous with these JB requests. Play the game!!!! Talk about nitpicking the tiniest stuff. It's like no one will ever be happy with anything.
 
Are we actually getting into discussion about moral theory over a single person getting their team changed in a game server?

Holy crap. You guys are getting ridiculous with these JB requests. Play the game!!!! Talk about nitpicking the tiniest stuff. It's like no one will ever be happy with anything.
I?m using moral theory to analyze arguments. This entire discussion literally boils down to perceptions of right/wrong, so I see nothing wrong with my statements.

I don?t think that it?s right to ignore an argument just because it applies something that?s more ?real life? to it.

More to the point, do you disagree with my analysis?
 
Can we just move along and just say no to this k thanks. No need to make every suggestion a warzone
 
That would be like giving people warden priority for dying early into the round by T's. It'll make it unfair. JB is like the lottery; luck based and that makes it fair.
-1
 
Can we just move along and just say no to this k thanks. No need to make every suggestion a warzone

I?ve said it before and I?ll say it again.

There is no need for a stigma against argumentation. It is a productive way of gathering information about viewpoints to make well informed decisions.

I don?t believe that just because disagreements make you uncomfortable that it should be disallowed.

I?m having civil discussion with other people who disagree with me through basic argumentative principle. What is wrong with that?
 
That would be like giving people warden priority for dying early into the round by T's. It'll make it unfair. JB is like the lottery; luck based and that makes it fair.
-1

Could you explain further how the two are comparable (warden priority for dying vs being put at the front of the queue for being randomly swapped)? I’m not quite following along. One of my main points was that being swapped for 1:3 ratio is completely out of ones control.
 
Being punished for something you have no control over is stupid. Those who are forcefully balance swapped should be dropped back in front of the queue if you ask me.
 
Personally I feel that if a CT gets randomly swapped because of 1:3 ratio then he should be bumped back to the top of the CT queue. He was already first in queue so he should maintain that priority.

I also agree that CT's should be regularly rotated to diversify the game. I'd like to see like a half-time team swap where CT's who have been CT 30 mins+ get swapped to T.
Being punished for something you have no control over is stupid. Those who are forcefully balance swapped should be dropped back in front of the queue if you ask me.
This. If it's not too much trouble for tech this should be implemented

Technically the person on CT who got ratio swapped was higher in the queue than anyone waiting and weren't swapped for a real reason, so they should just be put back on top. But the people who have been on CT the entire map should be swapped after a while to give others a chance to practice/play on guard

+1 Masty boi
 
I have a solution.
When swapped, you will not be moved to the front of the queue. This will not be a feature in Jailbreak2. I am looking into a supplement to resolve this, but this is not the way.

Closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top