- Joined
- May 27, 2018
- Messages
- 20
Here's the story. At roughly 5:45, the map was vipinthemix. It was a little over halfway through the round. There were rebellers, and I tried killing them but couldn't and ran out of ammo.. Completely out of ammo. Out in my AK, out in my Deagle.
Now I've seen this happen many times, as in a lot of people do it. What I'm talking about is I ran back to armory, got my guns again, then tried going back to stack. I then happened to run into Luft. He was rebelling (which I had no idea he was) and then I killed him.
We then had a brief argue between if I was in the wrong or not. He brought up the "you should always be in sight unless pursuing rebellers" rule, which is true. But I fought that I was only able to use a knife, and needed a weapon to kill rebellers. I asked an Jacko and tried asking Arbiter, but only Jacko responded.
His reply:
[5:50 PM]
Jacko:
ehh id let the ct get ammo as long as hes not intentionally doing it to check armory
its situational
admin discretion really
Luft tried asking Zimm to which he just said "You shouldn't run out of ammo unless your stupid (Evidence as provided https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd....523/7F6A39490A701E38F0A1316BCCC423D529376424/). Which I didn't find as a good (or nice) enough evidence to be why I broke said rule.
This argue between me and luft went on for 20-ish minutes and I thought the community and higher ups should decide. Thanks
Sincerely,
Xavier
Key: Underlined message is the main point of the post
Bold: Bolded message is evidence.
Now I've seen this happen many times, as in a lot of people do it. What I'm talking about is I ran back to armory, got my guns again, then tried going back to stack. I then happened to run into Luft. He was rebelling (which I had no idea he was) and then I killed him.
We then had a brief argue between if I was in the wrong or not. He brought up the "you should always be in sight unless pursuing rebellers" rule, which is true. But I fought that I was only able to use a knife, and needed a weapon to kill rebellers. I asked an Jacko and tried asking Arbiter, but only Jacko responded.
His reply:
[5:50 PM]
Jacko:
ehh id let the ct get ammo as long as hes not intentionally doing it to check armory
its situational
admin discretion really
Luft tried asking Zimm to which he just said "You shouldn't run out of ammo unless your stupid (Evidence as provided https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd....523/7F6A39490A701E38F0A1316BCCC423D529376424/). Which I didn't find as a good (or nice) enough evidence to be why I broke said rule.
This argue between me and luft went on for 20-ish minutes and I thought the community and higher ups should decide. Thanks
Sincerely,
Xavier
Key: Underlined message is the main point of the post
Bold: Bolded message is evidence.













