That's a good point, it's hard balance reducing toxicity with increasing more opportunities for T's to complain/clog things up. I think it the reality is CT toxicity is mostly a grey zone because there is almost always an argument for delaying or detouring if you don't exactly follow the commands. Impossible to regulate toxicity out of JB, but luckily most CTs aren't overly toxic. A handful are just legit bad CTs but the majority are good.Warning shots are good in idea, not very good in practice.
I personally use them all the time if someone's slacking a bit, but if they became a "right" in the rulebook, you get a LOT of complaining about people thinking they were entitled to a warning shot and whatnot. It's basically like everyone creating their own definition of what pushes the line and then bitching about it to admins, instead of the current systems of admins creating their own versions and just admining off of it.
Also complaining that admins do not always make the best decision towards toxicity, while valid for some, is something that is just always going to exist. You either trust the people to create their own version of toxicity and then bitch to admins, have the admins create their own version, or create an ultra restrictive and complex rulebook.
The first one is never going to work for obvious reasons, and the complex rulebook isn't a good idea because then the rules become more complex, fewer people know about them, and the more argument you're going to have in admin chat. Admins creating their own versions of rule interpretation is never going to be perfect (We're humans too), but has proven to be the best option time after timer again.
I know a lot of people have been asking for more admins to be on JB lately but I have actually seen quite a lot on pretty regularly over the last couple weeks and I think things have actually improved a bit tbh.







