Gamer's Opinion

Joined
Sep 29, 2008
Messages
81
When video game developers make modern war based games do you think they aim for them to be realistic, and do you think that it's a good thing?

I've had someone tell me that being realistic ruins games like Call of Duty 4.

"CoD's online play is a joke. Shooting through walls? Come on. Games were meant to not be realistic."

what's your opinion?
 
in my opinion realistic games can be fun at times but not when some one is spawn camping ur spawn and war is not ment to be fun :) thats my opinion
 
When video game developers make modern war based games do you think they aim for them to be realistic, and do you think that it's a good thing?

I've had someone tell me that being realistic ruins games like Call of Duty 4.

"CoD's online play is a joke. Shooting through walls? Come on. Games were meant to not be realistic."

what's your opinion?

It adds more strategy :)
 
If the game is fun to play .. realistic or not....... no matters for me !!!
I prefer DODS vs BF2.. these 2 games have a real story .. WW2 vs modern war .. but BF2 is too arcade for me .. sniping sucks a lot !!
COD4 is a nice game.. but i prefer WW2 theme!! The real war :P
 
I think different kinds of gamers want different types of gameplay. Take America's Army for example. Really realistic, and wildly popular, but few Cs:S peopl will like it :)
 
umm since when is shooting through walls a new thing?????? lol COD4 has no realism. The guns have zero recoil and shoot like lazer beams.
 
Cod4 is not realistic. At all.

Go play Operation Flashpoint kids.
 
As far as realism goes, and whether or not it ruins games:

HAVE YOU PLAYED THE HISTORY CHANNEL GAMES?
 
I think there is a line. Too realistic and u just get too complicated. Too Cartoony...and you get TF2...witch is great...but it's an entirely different game.
 
Back
Top