- Joined
- Apr 14, 2009
- Messages
- 3,745
Long story short: a few friends at work and myself have been arguing for close to a month whether it would be best to kill Bigfoot if you encountered him in the wild or to let him live.
So the question is:
If you were hunting in the woods and saw Bigfoot would you kill him to provide concrete evidence of his existence, or would you let him go on his merry way and throw away any chance of proof, in exchange for letting him live?
Let me clarify: You are in the middle of the woods, you don't have a camera anywhere nearby, its raining so you cant come back and take footprints of him, and basically your only options are to kill or not to kill.
(NOTE: This may be a repost, since i think my original got deleted when the Forums went 20hrs back in time)
So the question is:
If you were hunting in the woods and saw Bigfoot would you kill him to provide concrete evidence of his existence, or would you let him go on his merry way and throw away any chance of proof, in exchange for letting him live?
Let me clarify: You are in the middle of the woods, you don't have a camera anywhere nearby, its raining so you cant come back and take footprints of him, and basically your only options are to kill or not to kill.
(NOTE: This may be a repost, since i think my original got deleted when the Forums went 20hrs back in time)
Last edited:




















