Modern Warfare 2 VS Battlefield Bad Company 2
- Thread starter soLitary
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2009
- Messages
- 4,081
Does it even need to be said? Bad company 2 is like cods big brother. Plus for playing with friends battlefield has always been the number one game because of squads and working together as a team. Having one person fly and another gun etc. You actually work tactically like a squad and it makes a difference, cod is just mainly about going it alone and killing people no matter what game mode.
Last edited:
Heh from the way MW2 turned, out take it from personal experience, your way better off with bad company 2. I regret ever buying MW2, I coulda saved that money for bad company 2 instead. This is my stand point, if you want a buggy/glitch full/camping/kill streak dominated/hacker filled/laggy servers (since it picks the person within the match your in, with the "best" connection to host, and usually turns out to be a laggy host.) game... then get MW2.
Now for those of you that have played MW2 do not try to defend the game, you know Infinity Ward messed up with this one, how ever much better you try to make the game look...This will always be fact (COD4>MW2) :facewall: And btw I also have MW2 on the xbox 360...It's just as bad, if not worse then the PC version when it comes to glitches etc.
By the way, I still play MW2 because it does have an upside believe it or not, the titles/emblems/new guns and I play with high hopes that infinity ward will deliver in the long run...hopefully.
Now for those of you that have played MW2 do not try to defend the game, you know Infinity Ward messed up with this one, how ever much better you try to make the game look...This will always be fact (COD4>MW2) :facewall: And btw I also have MW2 on the xbox 360...It's just as bad, if not worse then the PC version when it comes to glitches etc.
By the way, I still play MW2 because it does have an upside believe it or not, the titles/emblems/new guns and I play with high hopes that infinity ward will deliver in the long run...hopefully.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
- Messages
- 2,641
It pretty much looks like DICE drank Infinity Wards milkshake on this one. Bad Company 2 seems superior in pretty much every way.
Context for the above reference:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHpM5US2HDs[/ame]
Context for the above reference:
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHpM5US2HDs[/ame]
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2009
- Messages
- 427
If all the videos of BF: BC2 are truthfully represented( And it seems like it to me according to all the Player-Made videos I've seen.), it is superior to MW2 in EVERY way except for the arcade-style. MW2 has really short matches where you either run around by yourself and kill people, or camp and wait for someone to approach.
BF: BC2 matches are longer, the destruction adds dynamic game-play, maps are large, and is much more rewarding when working as a team. Among other things. If you like just jumping into a match with anyone (Friend, Acquaintance, or a complete stranger) and kill, MW2 is for you.
I can't seem to think of the terms to explain all the reasons, so I'll just say this: I think BC2 is better in EVERY way then MW2, especially to the PC community (Full, yes, FULL DX9,10, and 11 support.)
DICE/EA are doing their absolute best to take the FPS Crown from IW. They are giving 2 month-long Betas, that shows confidence. It also means more balancing before official release. (They have released a text file of 130 changes for PS3). A lot, if not most, of the PC wants IW to go down in flames, all of EA/DICE want IW to be a forgotten name. Both developers and Community have the same exact goal, and both want ti above everything.
I can see only one thing stopping BC2 from succeeding: Failing to deliver what was promised. For both PC and Consoles.
BF: BC2 matches are longer, the destruction adds dynamic game-play, maps are large, and is much more rewarding when working as a team. Among other things. If you like just jumping into a match with anyone (Friend, Acquaintance, or a complete stranger) and kill, MW2 is for you.
I can't seem to think of the terms to explain all the reasons, so I'll just say this: I think BC2 is better in EVERY way then MW2, especially to the PC community (Full, yes, FULL DX9,10, and 11 support.)
DICE/EA are doing their absolute best to take the FPS Crown from IW. They are giving 2 month-long Betas, that shows confidence. It also means more balancing before official release. (They have released a text file of 130 changes for PS3). A lot, if not most, of the PC wants IW to go down in flames, all of EA/DICE want IW to be a forgotten name. Both developers and Community have the same exact goal, and both want ti above everything.
I can see only one thing stopping BC2 from succeeding: Failing to deliver what was promised. For both PC and Consoles.
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2009
- Messages
- 930
that.
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2008
- Messages
- 1,315
Hur dur I haes two shotguns that act like snipers, imma keel everyone.
Bad Company 2.
Bad Company 2.
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2008
- Messages
- 995
Hard to compare a game that's not released with one that is released. You should rent BC2 when it comes out and make your mind about a purchase after.
- Joined
- May 29, 2008
- Messages
- 1,401
well, the beta's out on the PS3, so you can watch gameplay vids, but I do agree that renting it woulld be a good idea
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2009
- Messages
- 4,081
Not really that hard with the beta and all the unoffical gameplay footage you can watch.
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2009
- Messages
- 3,218
Well it's hard to tell alot from just gameplay videos.
MW2 turned out to be alot more than what was shown in the videos.
MW2 turned out to be alot more than what was shown in the videos.
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2009
- Messages
- 645
I'd say BC, every battle turns out differently. I've played BC1 quite a bit and even on the same maps every thing changes. That gives you alot more playability than MW2 will.
My vote is BC2.
My vote is BC2.
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2008
- Messages
- 1,178
In the end it comes down to personal taste. Like someone suggested rent both of them and play them for a week and decide which one is better. Some are going to like Modern Warfare 2 over Bad Company 2 because it's a fast pace time game than Bad Company. Some are going to like Bad Company 2 because it's a more team base game and requires team work to win a game.
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2009
- Messages
- 930
dont forget the vehicles and such, in bc2 u can fly a choppa, transport your squad in it, they drop over a cap zone while u provide cover, drive a tank/atv/ car, repair a tank/engineer , be a medic, anti-tank, spec op/demo man, be a commander, etc etc etc
I hear ya on that the game looks pretty sick who are gonna be the ps3 owners of this game?
The best thing the BF:BC Series has going for it is it's destructible environment. The ability to destroy walls to get through them does so many things for the game. It basically takes care of campers, creates an ever changing environment, and basically makes fun and diverse game play.
My honest to heart opinion would have to be Bad Company 2. The dynamic, destructable, and all around awesomeness the game seems to present itself with is unmatched by MW2 and IW. Dont get me wrong, MW2 is a great game (except for the dedicated server BS) but Bad Company seems to seperate itself from the pack... it goes beyond the run shoot reload experience that MW2 prides itself on and puts a game out that everyone can enjoy... the snipers, the gunners, the flyers, the drivers... it looks to me like everyone is going to appreciate something other than the arcade run and gun shooter known as Modern Warfare 2
Last edited:
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2009
- Messages
- 1,031
Bad Company 2 as well
