CoH vs Sc2

[Tero]

The problem with sc2 is it's a tough game to really grasp the complexity of without being in more competitive play. Gold league and below isn't really tactical you can get by and win games consistently with cookie cutter strats and poor scouting. The higher leagues is when it starts being less about playing the game and more about playing the opponent. In diamond and above you win with strategy and throwing the other person off guard because building x and y will either get you hard countered and stomped or harassed to death.

I like the way sc2 combines different elements to make the game more complex instead of just focusing on making the game more 'complicated'.

I've never played bad company so I can't judge it but I just wanted to put in my two cents about sc2.

 

[Liliana]

I've never played bad company so I can't judge it but I just wanted to put in my two cents about sc2.

You seem to be mixing up two different games; that's a Battlefield game, while this is just Company of Heroes.

But yeah, I suppose that's right, the rest of your post. It also explains why I can still lose against other bronzes in a nicer way than "I'm bad"

 

[mdgrim]

In response to the original posters comment, Company of Heroes is far more tactical than the starcraft games. I personally haven't played much of the SC games (never liked SC, blob to win, not what I play RTS games for), but I have found CoH to be much more entertaining and challenging. + CoH is only $10 for the game without DLC so you cant really lose =p